[ucc] Services and Amenities fee

[David Cake]

>And finally, a quote.
>"What I want to know is, why I should be forced to fork out around 
>$140 so an organisation I would normally choose not to associate 
>with can subsidise its failing enterprises with my membership. [...]
>I do not identify with the Guild ideology. I did not elect its 
>representatives. I have no confidence that they would identify with 
>me, even if I had. I ascertain no balance in their views, and no 
>method to their approach.
>Freedom of association runs both ways. I ask for and receive nothing 
>from the Guild, and next year I will pay for this privilege."

	Now, anyone who would claim to agree with this while 
remaining an active  member of a sub-organisation of the Guild (such 
as a club), while enjoying heavily subsidised club rooms, etc, would 
be somewhat hypocritical, right?
	Cheers
		David