[ucc] RE: [ucc-announce] New Door Group Regime

[Dave Emrich]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthias Liffers" <matthias at deiectus.com>
To: <ucc at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 7:15 PM
Subject: [ucc] RE: [ucc-announce] New Door Group Regime


> > rules.  The compromise that was reached (and we've been more
> > compromised by this than the guild but it is their building)
>
> The building DOES belong to the Guild, doesn't it?  Aren't we all Guild
> members?
>
> Therefore, the building belongs to us.  The problem is that the Guild
> obviously doesn't believe that we have the maturity and responsibility
> for self-management.

After the Manic's firealarm fiasco, and knowing the state that UCC's
clubroom can get into, do you _really_ wonder about that belief..?

> I remember speaking to a current Guild person (I
> can't remember his name) who was very adamant that "Everyone wants the
> services that the Guild provides, but nobody wants to pay for them."
>
> I've paid my Guild membership, my UCC membership, my Unigames membership
> and my UniSFA membership, yet I still don't get to access the Guild
> services that I paid for, when I want to.
>
> Ergh.  Sorry for sounding so political, this just pisses me off.

I'm sure having to fork out thousands of bucks for FESA people to come out
in response to alarms pisses off the Guild too....

Did _anything_ come of that, or did they essentially get away with a
wrist-slap...

Or is this the official response to that aforementioned incident.

[DAV]