[ucc] RE: [ucc-announce] New Door Group Regime

[Nick Bannon]

On Sat, Sep 14, 2002 at 12:29:16PM +0800, Anil Sharma wrote:
> Bullshit.  For once I think the guild is actually taking responsibility for 
> the going ons in Cameron Hall.

I congratulate them on a good try, but it doesn't really address the
stated problems. We already know who caused the fire alarms, and it's
not like they occured at particularly weird hours when you'd expect
Cameron Hall to be closed. The junk and litter obstructing the
stairwells isn't something that can be addressed by this, at all.

As for the UCC, the reason we had such a long door list was because we
actually took the idea of having a trustworthy person in the room
seriously, for our own benefit. The other clubs have always been more
lenient about leaving the room open when the official keyholders have
to wander off.

Last time it was logged, we had the UCC clubroom open 11.7 hours a day,
because people actually wanted to use it.

[...]
> What happened to that thousand and one secret cameras idea for the room btw?

I don't know about secret cameras, but I think that any ones that exist
should be public ones. If a camera watches you, you should have direct
access to its footage; if it's watching a public place, its footage
should be public. Wouldn't it be useful if a URL was printed under
every camera?

Nick.

-- 
     Nick Bannon      | "I made this letter longer than usual because
  nick-sig at rcpt.to    | I lack the time to make it shorter." - Pascal
http://linux.conf.au/ |  Australian Linux Technical Conference, 2003