[committee] [hwc] AARNet Charges for May 08

[Scott Young]

I accidentally copied ITS (bills at elysium) on my email, so if you
reply, please make sure your reply isn't going to that address too.

On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Scott Young <scott at sjy.id.au> wrote:
> I have debited dispense accounts for the following two machines:
>
>> 130.95.13.36    troppo.ucc.gu.uw      0.00    0.02    0.00    0.00     0.02
> Jun  3 12:57:21 mermaid ucc_srv: success - add -2 cents to jacques
> [troppo may 2008 traffic inc GST] by splintax [balance -5030]
>
>> 130.95.13.24    rattle.bur.st         0.00   49.01    0.00    0.00    49.01
> Jun  3 12:54:40 mermaid ucc_srv: success - add -5391 cents to bonfire
> [rattle may 2008 traffic inc gst] by splintax [balance -4516]
>
> Jacques, I seem to remember you discussing decommissioning troppo
> (which is why it was offered to the club). Has this been done? Can we
> expect bills for troppo in coming months?
>
> The following machines seem to incur regular traffic charges, and I'm
> not 100% sure what I need to be doing about them:
>
>> 130.95.13.106   marcel.shmookey.      0.00    0.19    0.00    0.00     0.19 (shmookey)
>> 130.95.13.111   evil.ucc.gu.uwa.      0.00    0.21    0.00    0.00     0.21 (matt? he seems to have paid for some traffic in the past)
>> 130.95.13.13    enki.rcpt.to          0.00    0.62    0.00    0.00     0.62 (looks like [NTU] has been keeping dispense records for this up-to-date, under the 'rcptto' account)
>> 130.95.13.14    dagon.rcpt.to         0.00   77.38    0.00    0.00    77.38 (as with enki)
>> 130.95.13.29    coolstore.ucc.gu      0.00    2.47    0.00    0.00     2.47 (dagobah?)
>> 130.95.13.84    paradise.ucc.gu.      0.00    0.07    0.00    0.00     0.07 (zanchey seems to be keeping this one up-to-date)
>
> I'm not terribly concerned over any monthly charges for < $1, but I
> would like to know what exactly the deal is with these. Has there been
> any firm say in the past on what the minimum number of charges should
> be before we start chasing people up for money? Are those who have
> been keeping bills up to date in the past happy to continue doing so?
> Is it something that the treasurer should be monitoring regularly?
>