[committee] Postponing reports etc

[David Gow]

Personally, I think that postponing the reports is not going to aid things.
  The normal items can be dealt with pretty quickly if everyone 
keeps their reports short, and we can get the machine technical reports 
(which need doing: meersau is in some superposition of up and down 
states) and reimbursements put through quickly, and then get to the big 
issues at the end.

Given these issues will fill whatever time we give them, let's leave them 
to the end so that other things are not forgotten.

On the bright side, we might get the winadmin policy we clearly 
desperately need out of this.

-- David

On Tue, 14 Aug 2012, Jeremy Cole wrote:

> We could deal with the other items via email voting...
>
> On 14/08/2012, at 11:35 AM, John Hodge <tpg at ucc.asn.au> wrote:
>
>> Vote against - These discussions could take quite a long time, it's better to get the normal items out of the way before we get deep into the discussions.
>>
>> On Mon, 13 Aug 2012, Jeremy Cole wrote:
>>
>>> Seconded and Voting for
>>>
>>> M12
>>>
>>> On 13/08/2012, at 10:53 PM, Lyndon White <oxinabox at ucc.asn.au> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I would like to suggest a procedural motion that we postpone the normal reports, review of action items etc until after we discuss the 3 "big issues": Complaint about committee, complaints about the incrowd attitude, and *the camp.*
>>>> Not nesc in that order. I feel that these things are important, and are going to get in the way of the rest of the meeting.
>>>> Reports can take a backseat I i think
>>>> Frames
>>>> [*OX]
>>>> OCM
>>>
>