[committee] Possible coke/door revision

[Frames]

I agree if we were to merge the groups, then the combined group should 
be door.
I actually think keeping them seperate is a good idea.
They have seperate responsibilities,
A good coke member goes on Coke runs regularly, and does daily handling 
of money.
a good door member attends cleanups regularly, and does daily handling 
of people.
Giving our responsible members the option to choose which 
responsibilities they have is good.
Avoid burn out etc.

I myself have long resisted pressure to join Coke,
because after doing all the fridge runs for unigames, when I was it's 
tressurer,
I flat refuse to do Coke runs.

Should we merge Winadmin/Sprocket and Webmasters?
[*OX]


Sam Moore wrote:
> If we want to do this, we should keep "door" as the name and make coke 
> a part of door. The name as it is makes sense and requires a minimal 
> number of syllables.
>
> Otherwise, I think this is an OK idea, but on the other hand I don't 
> think whatever problems it may solve are really an issue.
>
> [SZM]
>
> On Sat, 14 Dec 2013, Andrew Gozzard wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Committee is (tentatively) considering merging coke and door as part 
>> of our upcoming policy review. Of course the most critical part of 
>> this process is finding an awesome, new, computer-related name for 
>> this group. Suggestions that have been made so far include:
>>
>> - daemon (always active when clubroom is active, provides a service)
>> - clubroomd
>> - watchdog
>> - watchman
>> - COP (clubroom operating properly)
>>
>> Suggestions and comments are welcome.
>>
>> Regards,
>> [GOZ]
>>