[committee] Possible coke/door revision

[Andrew Gozzard]

The groups are practically merged already, we only have 2 members of door 
who aren't on coke, and 5 on coke who aren't on door (some wheel members 
are not listed as being on door, I am not counting them).

The only downside I can see is to those members who want to be on coke but 
are unwilling to attend cleanups (the vast majority of coke, including 
myself, don't do coke runs with any regularity).

It need not be implemented as a strict merger, but can rather be an 
expectation for which committee can make exceptions if need be.

The main advantages of this are the guarantee that there will always be a 
coke member in the room, and having a more natural way of purging people 
from coke (not attending cleanups).

[GOZ]

> To what end?
>
> Andrew Adamson
> bob at ucc.asn.au
>
> |"If you can't beat them, join them, and then beat them."                |
> | ---Peter's Laws                                                        |
>
> On Sat, 14 Dec 2013, Andrew Gozzard wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Committee is (tentatively) considering merging coke and door as part of our
>> upcoming policy review. Of course the most critical part of this process is
>> finding an awesome, new, computer-related name for this group. Suggestions
>> that have been made so far include:
>>
>> - daemon (always active when clubroom is active, provides a service)
>> - clubroomd
>> - watchdog
>> - watchman
>> - COP (clubroom operating properly)
>>
>> Suggestions and comments are welcome.
>>
>> Regards,
>> [GOZ]
>>
>