<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">I suggest a couple of changes:<br>
Replace "doored member or non-member" and "doored member" with
doored person.<br>
for clarity/brevity.<br>
<br>
<ul>
<li>Make it very clear as to wether or not dooring someone as
punishment is reasonable.</li>
<li>Make it clear what happens if 2 people door each other (I
think it is resonable for them both to be doored).</li>
</ul>
<p>Less importantly:<br>
</p>
<ul>
<li>Make it clear whether the dooring person can say "Door
someone for the day", or "Until they calm down.".</li>
<li>Make it clear wether committee can undoor someone outside of
the meeting.</li>
<li>Make it clear whether committee can strip someone of their
dooring powers/suspend them from door, outside of a meeting.</li>
</ul>
Frames<br>
<br>
On 14/05/2013 2:47 PM, Sam Moore wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:alpine.DEB.2.00.1305141443440.25307@motsugo.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au"
type="cite">Committee is reviewing the door policy (or lack
thereof).
<br>
<br>
A proposed policy is here:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.ucc.asn.au/infobase/policies/door0.4.ucc">http://www.ucc.asn.au/infobase/policies/door0.4.ucc</a>
<br>
<br>
At the moment, committee is likely to pass this policy at the next
meeting.
<br>
<br>
Discuss.
<br>
<br>
[SZM]
<br>
UCC Vice President 2013
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>