<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p>Melissa,</p>
<p>Thank you for talking to me and accepting what I said about the
meeting's timing.</p>
<p>Conversely, I can empathise with your line of thinking and
retract my earlier statement about it being absurd. I overreached
somewhat in trying to get my point across.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>James<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 31/7/19 9:26 pm, Melissa Star wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:6CD25D20-5613-4132-9029-79C575645310@netexperts.com.au">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
Hi James,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I spoke to you earlier today and accepted your word in
regards to the timing of the meeting being a genuine
coincidence.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>However, persons unknown are voting on expelling me from the
club, with me having no prior notice of their intentions, or for
what cause, even though it could not possibly be anything recent
as I haven’t been involved at all since the committee meeting in
which I resigned as club secretary.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Giving that:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>1. this happened on two days notice, </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>2. that I only found because the agenda appeared in my email,
and </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>3. that transgender people being quietly thrown out of social
groups behind their back because of who we are is anything but
unusual.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>You should accept that the conclusion I made, even if it was
incorrect was at least subjectively NOT absurd.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I’m supposed to go to see a friend tonight but after this
email I’m so stressed I’m not sure I can drive properly.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I believe you are aware that previous bullying I’ve
experienced within UCC has led to a serious decline in my
health.</div>
<div><br>
<br>
<div id="AppleMailSignature" dir="ltr">Sent from my iPhone</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
On 31 Jul 2019, at 2:40 pm, James Arcus <<a
href="mailto:jimbo@ucc.asn.au" moz-do-not-send="true">jimbo@ucc.asn.au</a>>
wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=UTF-8">
<p>Hi all,</p>
<p>There's a lot going on on the list that warrants further
consideration, but I feel the need to address one point in
particular with urgency, as I have both heard and read
accusations relating to it already.<br>
</p>
<p><i>The OGM was scheduled as required to elect a new OCM.</i>
The date and time was chosen by committee considering the
constitutional deadline and the fact that in my
experience, lunch meetings often clash with classes and
other commitments. I made the suggestion to have it around
5 pm, and others concurred.<br>
</p>
<p>Most importantly, the OGM <b>was not</b><b> </b>scheduled
with <i>any</i> consideration or knowledge of the
timetables of individual members. It was also scheduled
without knowledge of motions that were later proposed by
other members.</p>
<p>The suggestion that the meeting was scheduled at a
particular time to prevent the attendance of a specific
member is untrue and, frankly, absurd.<br>
</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
<p>James [MPT]<br>
</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr"><span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
<span>List Archives: <a
href="http://lists.ucc.asn.au/pipermail/ucc"
moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.ucc.asn.au/pipermail/ucc</a></span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span>Unsubscribe here: <a
href="https://lists.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au/mailman/options/ucc/melissa%40melissastar.com.au"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au/mailman/options/ucc/melissa%40melissastar.com.au</a></span></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>