AW: Dropbear - Cygwin - Performance
Michael Wiedmann
michael.wiedmann at aastra.com
Tue Mar 22 15:05:43 WST 2011
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 02:18, Stuart Longland wrote:
> I wonder if this could be due to some Cygwin quirk? I know for a fact
> that fork() is quite an expensive operation in Cygwin (no
> copy-on-write), and I hear its threadding support is somewhat
primitive.
I'd say that one call to fork() is neglectable.
The real problem is the network performance during
file transfer through the tunnel.
Michael
More information about the Dropbear
mailing list