Dropbear test version 2013.61test with ECC

[Matt Johnston]

On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 05:22:13PM +0100, Daniel Cegiełka wrote:
> Thank you Matt! Thank you Adam! :)
> 
> btw. can we use qhasm version as an option for x86 (curve25519)?

Hi Daniel,

Is x86 performance an issue with the current code? Binary
size might be a reason to use the asm version, though
probably on other CPUs? Generally I'd prefer to keep it
portable and relatively readable.

Cheers,
Matt