I use WinSCP. No complaints.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Matt Johnston <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:matt@ucc.asn.au">matt@ucc.asn.au</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 20:47:43 +0100, "Hans J. Koch" <<a href="mailto:hjk@linutronix.de">hjk@linutronix.de</a>><br>
wrote:<br>
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">> On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 02:38:02PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> i am most emphatically *not* a windows person, but a co-worker wants<br>
>> to set up some kind of graphical (windows XP) client to SCP files to<br>
>> an embedded system running dropbear.<br>
>><br>
>> i set up the embedded system, dropbear is running just fine, etc,<br>
>> etc. putty is installed on the windows XP system and i know there is<br>
>> a pscp, but it appears to be a real PITA to set up, unless we're just<br>
>> being dense.<br>
>><br>
>> any downloadable recommendations? you know, the point and click<br>
>> kind? thanks.<br>
><br>
> WinSCP ?<br>
<br>
</div></div>WinSCP tends to be my preferred choice - it can be a single binary like<br>
PuTTY.<br>
Some people seem to like FileZilla too, take a look at that?<br>
<br>
Apart from the UI, transfer speed can vary wildly between SCP clients.<br>
Granted Dropbear isn't the speediest SSH server, but in the past I have<br>
seen 10x performance difference between windows SCP clients to the same<br>
server. I think it has improved a bit these days, though test it out.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Matt<br>
<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>