<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000099">
<br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>
Hash: SHA1<br>
<br>
I can help with a uClibc build environment - I build packages for
Alpine Linux (which uses uClibc) & have recently been testing a
build environment for it in LXC on Debian - a working Alpine system
is 5 meg in size.<br>
<br>
I've attached an Alpine template (from Alpine - its newer than the
template in Debian Testing) - it's simple to get working in Debian
with these notes:<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/LXC">http://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/LXC</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.debian.org/LXC">https://wiki.debian.org/LXC</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/LXC"><http://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/LXC></a><br>
The root password is blank & networking needs to be enabled in
the Alpine Guest with:<br>
<br>
/*rc-update add networking boot<br>
rc-service networking start*/<br>
<br>
Build tools can be installed with:<br>
<br>
/*apk add alpine-sdk*/<br>
<br>
Stuart.<br>
<br>
<br>
On 02/17/2014 08:15 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:<br>
<span style="white-space: pre;">> On Monday, February 17, 2014
14:35:24 Christopher Meng wrote:<br>
>> 2014-2-17 PM1:42 "Mike Frysinger"
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:vapier@gentoo.org"><vapier@gentoo.org></a>:<br>
>>> what is this "we" business ? lots of people use
uClibc, and that isn't<br>
>>> the problem here. in fact, building 2013.62 w/uClibc
works just fine for<br>
>>> me.<br>
>><br>
>> Lots of people don't use it as well.<br>
><br>
> i never said everyone uses it whereas you said "we don't use
it". there is no <br>
> collective "we" that you can speak authoritatively for.<br>
><br>
>> Thus many people can't help since we<br>
>> can't be in the same environment like his basically, then
we are impossible<br>
>> to find the problem as the conditions are not the same.<br>
><br>
> sorry that is bs. getting a system using uClibc instead of
glibc is not hard <br>
> at all (there are released distros based on it) which means
it is not <br>
> "impossible". further, it doesn't take a whole lot of
deductive reasoning to <br>
> think about the problem and where the issue actually lies.<br>
><br>
>> But never because of not tied to Linux.<br>
><br>
> i have no idea what that means. uClibc is a C library, not a
kernel.<br>
><br>
>>> the problem is that Steve's kernel headers are
broken. he didn't say what<br>
>>> version he's using, but i'm guessing ancient
considering that header was<br>
>>> fixed in the 2.6.29 release to include linux/types.h
correctly.<br>
>><br>
>> Maybe, but who knows this exactly especially when
we(don't you?) don't know<br>
>> about the details.<br>
><br>
> well, my response was a lot more reasonable/useful than your
dismissive one <br>
> line response<br>
> -mike</span><br>
<br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
Version: GnuPG v1<br>
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.enigmail.net/">http://www.enigmail.net/</a><br>
<br>
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTAc7dAAoJEFT/IHPMDdVInwkQAKD+CG1ZtR0NxWu9fqHiVFYo<br>
Ui9FQzDlwZcoZDyjNDIgDBzeBS0p7eq+UPQ7RlJOyQam9LXBdhpkKnM6PHe05aZj<br>
ngoTr30ZOlo6fAQmS9r83iuMx5/LuyCuE6xOS/xcpJbtPrP+ldIQ0XQ34yd8pqWG<br>
F7m1sbFGy8pL99jQWFcy0e350t6wQWuroCi5gFGLAWqfBdjmshFyb8RDe7TI1pts<br>
+NC6yURnNEpgjwgyuFXzjUBDkd4nJMYxwMXnLgh2aKf/VxQZBObd2+66ujBML3ce<br>
JaC5qAYbncM0Rcwtz/BILUnHLpwwNlee7dA+EgZSQcaiF6EWSKacr3IfTK0Apc3p<br>
+JZFpIy3d7r3XoSEsuVUKTTXs/j6boPZQtfzL1X4uVr7PZJcmja/Zia/s+T6zNYU<br>
Cb2/WoWMrb01aBoIIrvV//8w3+tPdkfskuucSiRU/ILoqbEznsKJz1wg4175QMkd<br>
QI7TWxIEkD6jD4zl9903exOj7ZtlrVaF+sVXWX78wSNFZlvwj03ctsMuBwBMN16P<br>
EuAUIU2M4reGNgzRh/nKgrAXA7tOGVo6tcRYDpCQ+febJPFSMiHHyoe5QVdV3YZ1<br>
v0rco/h2RUCLB10vWIq6fkukfeI+W0etTwrWoBgEP+nms2oQzRPZmlyH+BMv9opQ<br>
aj578/4AyAE43Pl3TzSk<br>
=e8ke<br>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>