[tech] flamebox

Ian McKellar yakk at yakk.net.au
Thu Nov 18 15:25:23 WST 1999


On Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 03:09:55PM +0800, Ian McKellar wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 03:02:32PM +0800, Andrew Williams wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Nov 1999 14:50:08 +0800, Ian McKellar wrote:
> > 
> > >On Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 02:44:15PM +0800, David Manchester wrote:
> > >> OK... cool... wanna tell us who weren't involved in the discussion, why
> > >> this was done..? To alleviate some of Moray's maladies..?
> > >
> > >I think the idea was to give the flame project a bit more flexibility and
> > >independance from moray.
> > 
> > Which I disagree with, as I've said.
> 
> Why is that (and I don't think I've heard you say it)?

Oh, I just did.

Yes, I do agree with you, but if flame _does_ need a seperate box, then UCC
should be providing it. Its one of the few active projects at UCC.

Ian

-- 
Ian  McKellar | Email: yakk(a)yakk.net     | Web: http://www.yakk.net/
Fax: +61 (8) 9265 0821 / +0 (775) 205 0307 | Home: +61 (8) 9389 9152




More information about the tech mailing list