From mtearle at tartarus.uwa.edu.au Tue Dec 5 17:33:15 2000 From: mtearle at tartarus.uwa.edu.au (Mark Tearle) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:21:53 2004 Subject: [tech] robots.txt file Message-ID: A robots.txt file has been added to the UCC web site at http://www.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au/ to exclude all user directories from search enginess (*due to BFK*) (and so we can get put back in the UWA search engine again) Yours Mark -- Mark Tearle - mark@tearle.com "You howl and listen Listen and wait for the Echoes of angels who won't return" From nick at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au Wed Dec 6 17:11:31 2000 From: nick at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (Nick Bannon) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:21:55 2004 Subject: [tech] mooneye Message-ID: <20001206171131.T1142@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> mooneye was down again - thanks for the notice, Andrew. It was pinging, but not much else. I couldn't log in on the console. It didn't come up on the first reboot - it oopsed, so I turned it off for a few minutes and then it started OK. We do intend to upgrade it to [TDH]'s dual P90 system, on Friday if not before. Nick. -- Nick Bannon | "I made this letter longer than usual because nick@it.net.au | I lack the time to make it shorter." - Pascal From nick at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au Wed Dec 6 17:21:57 2000 From: nick at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (Nick Bannon) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:21:55 2004 Subject: [tech] mooneye In-Reply-To: <20001206171131.T1142@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>; from nick@ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au on Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 05:11:31PM +0800 References: <20001206171131.T1142@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> Message-ID: <20001206172157.V1142@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 05:11:31PM +0800, Nick Bannon wrote: > mooneye was down again - thanks for the notice, Andrew. It was pinging, [...] Andrew Williams, that is, he 'phoned. ::-) Andrew Bailey's mail about the broken mail server didn't get to me earlier... Seems to be happy now... definitely looks heat related. Nick. -- Nick Bannon | "I made this letter longer than usual because nick@it.net.au | I lack the time to make it shorter." - Pascal From yakk at yakk.net.au Wed Dec 6 17:41:19 2000 From: yakk at yakk.net.au (Ian McKellar) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:21:55 2004 Subject: [tech] robots.txt file In-Reply-To: ; from mtearle@tartarus.uwa.edu.au on Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 05:33:15PM +0800 References: Message-ID: <20001206174119.Q9292@yakk.net.au> On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 05:33:15PM +0800, Mark Tearle wrote: > A robots.txt file has been added to the UCC web site at > http://www.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au/ to exclude all user directories from > search enginess (*due to BFK*) (and so we can get put back in the > UWA search engine again) Would it be possible to only return that robots.txt for our uwa.edu.au address and not our ucc.asn.au address? That way member pages would still be indexed - but only at our non-UWA affiliated address? Ian From mglossop at tartarus.uwa.edu.au Thu Dec 7 02:42:06 2000 From: mglossop at tartarus.uwa.edu.au (Mark Glossop) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:21:55 2004 Subject: [tech] Mooneye down? Message-ID: Hi all, Just wondering, is mooneye down? (I can't load the UCC website) It pings ok tho', so I'm not sure... Found out when I tried to get to the UCC mirror site: I wanted to check the UCC homepage first - no joy. The mirror site is fine (since it's hosted off morwong.) Regards, Mark ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mark Glossop (mglossop@tartarus.uwa.edu.au) "You're not me, so you're irrelevant" - Dogbert Member of DNRC (Dogbert's New Ruling Class) From nick at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au Thu Dec 7 12:43:45 2000 From: nick at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (Nick Bannon) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:21:55 2004 Subject: [tech] Mooneye down? In-Reply-To: ; from mglossop@tartarus.uwa.edu.au on Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 02:42:06AM +0800 References: Message-ID: <20001207124345.X1142@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 02:42:06AM +0800, Mark Glossop wrote: > Just wondering, is mooneye down? (I can't load the UCC website) It pings ok > tho', so I'm not sure... Yep, down it went again. It's sitting in front of the air conditioner for today, so perhaps it'll make it through until tomorrow evening (when it's slated for replacement ::-) ). Nick. -- Nick Bannon | "I made this letter longer than usual because nick@it.net.au | I lack the time to make it shorter." - Pascal From gbowland at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au Sun Dec 10 01:16:20 2000 From: gbowland at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (Grahame Bowland) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:21:56 2004 Subject: [tech] Mooneye/Money Message-ID: <20001210011620.B134262@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> Just for documentation reasons: On Friday night we did some fiddling with mooneye. The dual-P90 system couldn't be made to work, so we grabbed money from the UCS machine room and transplanted mooneye's hard-drive into it. So mooneye now has the following processor: processor : 0 vendor_id : CyrixInstead cpu family : 4 model : 1 model name : 5x86 3x Core/Bus Clock stepping : 5 fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no sep_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : -1 wp : yes flags : bogomips : 33.07 Hopefully it'll be more stable now. Grahame From gbowland at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au Sun Dec 10 01:16:20 2000 From: gbowland at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (Grahame Bowland) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:21:56 2004 Subject: [tech] Mooneye/Money Message-ID: <20001210011620.B134262@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> Just for documentation reasons: On Friday night we did some fiddling with mooneye. The dual-P90 system couldn't be made to work, so we grabbed money from the UCS machine room and transplanted mooneye's hard-drive into it. So mooneye now has the following processor: processor : 0 vendor_id : CyrixInstead cpu family : 4 model : 1 model name : 5x86 3x Core/Bus Clock stepping : 5 fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no sep_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : -1 wp : yes flags : bogomips : 33.07 Hopefully it'll be more stable now. Grahame From dayta at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au Sun Dec 10 13:08:49 2000 From: dayta at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (Leighton Haynes) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:21:56 2004 Subject: [tech] Mooneye/Money *giggle* In-Reply-To: <20001210011620.B134262@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>; from gbowland@ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au on Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 01:16:20AM +0800 References: <20001210011620.B134262@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> Message-ID: <20001210130849.M11376@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> Nice try, however, when i came in this morning, mooneye's console was whining a lot about VM: do_try_to_free_page unable to.... I reset it, it came up ok. Leighton.. On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 01:16:20AM +0800, Grahame Bowland wrote: > Just for documentation reasons: > > On Friday night we did some fiddling with mooneye. The dual-P90 system > couldn't be made to work, so we grabbed money from the UCS machine room > and transplanted mooneye's hard-drive into it. So mooneye now has the > following processor: > > processor : 0 > vendor_id : CyrixInstead > cpu family : 4 > model : 1 > model name : 5x86 3x Core/Bus Clock > stepping : 5 > fdiv_bug : no > hlt_bug : no > sep_bug : no > f00f_bug : no > coma_bug : no > fpu : yes > fpu_exception : yes > cpuid level : -1 > wp : yes > flags : > bogomips : 33.07 > > Hopefully it'll be more stable now. > > Grahame -- Leighton... -- Part-time student. Full-time Programmer. Seeking the 36 hour day and the 10 hour working week. (08) 9272 9058 (Home - like I'm ever there) 0401 335 136 (Mobile - like it's ever on) From nick at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au Fri Dec 22 17:04:39 2000 From: nick at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (Nick Bannon) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:21:56 2004 Subject: [tech] morwong Message-ID: <20001222170439.A1239@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> morwong suffered an enormous slowdown, until someone rebooted it. I've got a process listing in morwong:/morwong.fith - anything seem odd? The lots of getty's are normal. The load average was low (0.67 or so?) but it was slow enough that NIS lookups were failing most of the time (-> some mail bounces, some failed logins). Uptime was about 21 days. Nick. -- Nick Bannon | "I made this letter longer than usual because nick@it.net.au | I lack the time to make it shorter." - Pascal From japester at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au Sat Dec 23 01:20:10 2000 From: japester at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (Jean-Paul Blaquiere) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:21:57 2004 Subject: [tech] morwong In-Reply-To: <20001222170439.A1239@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>; from nick@ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au on Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 05:04:39PM +0800 References: <20001222170439.A1239@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> Message-ID: <20001223012010.A8023@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> > On Dec 22, Nick Bannon scratched in indelible ink : > morwong suffered an enormous slowdown, until someone rebooted it. > > I've got a process listing in morwong:/morwong.fith - anything seem odd? > The lots of getty's are normal. > > The load average was low (0.67 or so?) but it was slow enough that NIS > lookups were failing most of the time (-> some mail bounces, some failed > logins). Uptime was about 21 days. > addendum. at ~4:30 when I logged out (and left work for the year), the load average was 2.99. top showed that the highest cpu usage process was a netscape at ~5%. I would have looked more, but top segfaulted, and the 30 second keystroke lag was getting to me. probably a memory leak in a well used program. Netscape maybe? /Jp... -- Jean-Paul Blaqui?re || Avatar of Computational japester@ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au || Thaumaturgy Words are fingers that point at the moon. Once you see the moon, you no longer need the fingers. -- someone, somewhere From nick at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au Sun Dec 31 19:05:46 2000 From: nick at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (Nick Bannon) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:21:57 2004 Subject: [tech] Re: [wheel] New Mutt, gnupg, for morwong. In-Reply-To: <20001231182823.A117844@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>; from james@rcpt.to on Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 06:28:23PM +0800 References: <20001231182823.A117844@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> Message-ID: <20001231190546.A111662@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 06:28:23PM +0800, James Bromberger wrote: > I have a new version of mutt (1.2.5i) compiled on morwong. I'd like to > install it over the existing version - 1.2.4i. Anyone mind if I do? Sounds good. If it requires a /usr/local/etc/Muttrc update, do it carefully, and make sure the documentation is in a readable directory (I just noticed it wasn't last time, and fixed it). > Also, what do people think about adding gpg support to /etc/Muttrc for > mutt to use gpg instead of pgp? I have it in my ~/.muttrc, but > it may be worth standardising on gpg. Depends on peoples current usage, > though. Well, I'm all for it, though for now I'm going to be paranoid about putting secret keys on shared machines. Nick. -- Nick Bannon | "I made this letter longer than usual because nick@it.net.au | I lack the time to make it shorter." - Pascal