[tech] Wireless

[Duncan Sargeant]

James Andrewartha wrote on Wed May 09, at 19:38 +0800:
> > How's the Cisco running? What would it take to route 130.95.13.0/26 and
> > 130.95.13.64/26 through it for the evening?
> 
> The Cisco is up, it's mudpuppy (or 130.95.13.96). It would take another
> transceiver and an ethernet cable.

Grahame, perhaps you could steal (with permission) a dozen from the
big box in UCS?

,dunc