[tech] proposed routing changes

[Nick Bannon]

On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 01:19:37PM +0800, James Andrewartha wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Nick Bannon wrote:
[...]
> > That's 172.26.42.0/24 ? However, as it's no longer routable elsewhere I
> > think we should drop use of it completely.
> 
> No - it's still used on the wireless and the loft networks, and I see no
> reason to break it when it's still working.

Well, it works within the clubroom, but 130.95.13.192/26 addresses
would be preferable. (because 172.26.42.0/24 doesn't have the benefit
of WAIX anyway)

> > So ;
> > 192.168.13.1 will be gringo's interface on vlan13? [Adrian: yup.]
> > 192.168.13.2 will be cthulhu's interface on vlan13? [Adrian: yup.]
> Don't forget camwhore, which is currently 130.95.100.251.

Does that mean we want Adrian to hold off the routing change until
camwhore gets a longer cat5 cable to plug into the Guild network? or is
130.95.13.62 sufficient?

Nick.

-- 
   Nick Bannon   | "I made this letter longer than usual because
nick-sig at rcpt.to | I lack the time to make it shorter." - Pascal