From nick at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au Fri Jun 11 21:53:05 2004
From: nick at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (Nick Bannon)
Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:49 2004
Subject: [tech] Duplicate snack machine EPROM burnt
Message-ID: <20040611135305.GR259163@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
[MTL] picked up a fistful of blank 27C256 EPROMs from [DAV] today. We
successfully read the snack machine original and burnt a duplicate which
the snack machine happily ran on.
Next up:
* networking the DOS PC with the EPROM burner;
* assembling a replacement ROM;
* running serial cables to the snack machine for testing - the
"printer" port and the possibly dead coin mechanism.
Nick.
--
Nick Bannon | "I made this letter longer than usual because
nick-sig@rcpt.to | I lack the time to make it shorter." - Pascal
From nick at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au Fri Jun 11 22:14:22 2004
From: nick at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (Nick Bannon)
Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:51 2004
Subject: [tech] madako, the new PC router
In-Reply-To: <20040326130530.GB186880@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
References: <20040326130530.GB186880@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
Message-ID: <20040611141422.GA272297@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 09:05:31PM +0800, Matt Johnston wrote:
[...]
> INTEL P4-2.8Ghz/512k/0.13U/SOCKET 478/NORTHWOOD/533MHZ FSB $246
> INTEL BLKD865GLCLK D865G/800FSB/3PCI/uATX/DDR400/AGP8X+Gfx/8xUSB2/GIG LAN/SATA $183
> 256MB PC3200 400MHz DDR Ram $66
> SEAGATE ST340015A BARRACUDA 5400.1/40GB/5400RPM/12.5MS/445MB/ATA-100/2MB/1YR W $79
> Network Card Intel EE Pro PCI 10/100TX Adapter OEM $68
> Skyhawk IPC-2025 2RU casing $388
>
> Total: $1030
It's arrived! It's got a basic Debian install and is sitting in the
rack under hydra. Possible fiddling with VLANs tomorrow, in conjunction
with olive, the Cisco 2924XL and later bertoli, the 2912? .
Nick.
--
Nick Bannon | "I made this letter longer than usual because
nick-sig@rcpt.to | I lack the time to make it shorter." - Pascal
From alastair at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au Sat Jun 12 17:57:57 2004
From: alastair at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (Alastair Irvine)
Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:52 2004
Subject: [tech] Duplicate snack machine EPROM burnt
In-Reply-To: <20040611135305.GR259163@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
References: <20040611135305.GR259163@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
Message-ID: <20040612095757.GA314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
When will the next bunch of work be done on the snack machine? Is there
any stuff I can do towards the ROM image in the meantime?
--
... "Say, does anyone know a restaurant where they serve penguin?" -- Guy Dyson
_____________________________________________________________________
| |
| -=*Alastair Irvine*=- |
| C-monkey/wanderer/board&RPGer/net-nut alastair@ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au |
|_____________________________________________________________________|
From bernard at blackham.com.au Sat Jun 12 18:05:10 2004
From: bernard at blackham.com.au (Bernard Blackham)
Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:52 2004
Subject: [tech] Duplicate snack machine EPROM burnt
In-Reply-To: <20040612095757.GA314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
References: <20040611135305.GR259163@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
<20040612095757.GA314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
Message-ID: <20040612100510.GH1980@blackham.com.au>
On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 05:57:57PM +0800, Alastair Irvine wrote:
> When will the next bunch of work be done on the snack machine? Is there
> any stuff I can do towards the ROM image in the meantime?
The new ROM image needs to be modified to use the inbuilt serial
port to chat (instead of the hypothetical 16550 that it's been
taught to use).
Code is in CVS.
My exams finish in about 2 weeks, so I'll be back on it then.
Bernard.
--
Bernard Blackham
From alastair at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au Sat Jun 12 18:48:28 2004
From: alastair at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (Alastair Irvine)
Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:52 2004
Subject: serial port; Re: [tech] Duplicate snack machine EPROM burnt
In-Reply-To: <20040612100510.GH1980@blackham.com.au>
References: <20040611135305.GR259163@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
<20040612095757.GA314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
<20040612100510.GH1980@blackham.com.au>
Message-ID: <20040612104828.GB314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
On Sat, 12 June, 2004 at 06:05:10PM +0800, Bernard Blackham wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 05:57:57PM +0800, Alastair Irvine wrote:
> > When will the next bunch of work be done on the snack machine? Is there
> > any stuff I can do towards the ROM image in the meantime?
>
> The new ROM image needs to be modified to use the inbuilt serial
> port to chat (instead of the hypothetical 16550 that it's been
> taught to use).
Damn, those schematics are huge. What is the part number of the IC (main
processor?) with the serial port in it?
>
> Code is in CVS.
http://cvs.ucc.asn.au/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/projects/openvend/
>
> My exams finish in about 2 weeks, so I'll be back on it then.
--
... How come wrong numbers are never busy?
_____________________________________________________________________
| |
| -=*Alastair Irvine*=- |
| C-monkey/wanderer/board&RPGer/net-nut alastair@ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au |
|_____________________________________________________________________|
From alastair at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au Sat Jun 12 18:56:55 2004
From: alastair at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (Alastair Irvine)
Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:53 2004
Subject: [tech] madako, the new PC router
In-Reply-To: <20040611141422.GA272297@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
References: <20040326130530.GB186880@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
<20040611141422.GA272297@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
Message-ID: <20040612105655.GC314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
On Fri, 11 June, 2004 at 10:14:22PM +0800, Nick Bannon wrote:
[snip]
>
> It's arrived! It's got a basic Debian install and is sitting in the
> rack under hydra. Possible fiddling with VLANs tomorrow, in conjunction
> with olive, the Cisco 2924XL and later bertoli, the 2912? .
How did the VLAN stuff go? Roughly what can those two Cisco devices do?
Are they routers, swiches, fibre mulitplexers or something completely
different?
--
... We are in bondage to the law so that we may be free.
_____________________________________________________________________
| |
| -=*Alastair Irvine*=- |
| C-monkey/wanderer/board&RPGer/net-nut alastair@ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au |
|_____________________________________________________________________|
From matt at ucc.asn.au Sat Jun 12 19:00:54 2004
From: matt at ucc.asn.au (Matt Johnston)
Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:53 2004
Subject: [tech] madako, the new PC router
In-Reply-To: <20040612105655.GC314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
References: <20040326130530.GB186880@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
<20040611141422.GA272297@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
<20040612105655.GC314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
Message-ID: <20040612110053.GE219587@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 06:56:55PM +0800, Alastair Irvine wrote:
> On Fri, 11 June, 2004 at 10:14:22PM +0800, Nick Bannon wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > It's arrived! It's got a basic Debian install and is sitting in the
> > rack under hydra. Possible fiddling with VLANs tomorrow, in conjunction
> > with olive, the Cisco 2924XL and later bertoli, the 2912? .
>
> How did the VLAN stuff go? Roughly what can those two Cisco devices do?
> Are they routers, swiches, fibre mulitplexers or something completely
> different?
Switches. IIRC bertoli only does ISL (Cisco proprietary FLAN stuff), not
802.1q or whatever. Could be wrong, someone'll correct me if I am.
Matt
From trs80 at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au Sat Jun 12 23:02:07 2004
From: trs80 at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (James Andrewartha)
Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:53 2004
Subject: [tech] madako, the new PC router
In-Reply-To: <20040612110053.GE219587@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
Message-ID:
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Matt Johnston wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 06:56:55PM +0800, Alastair Irvine wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 June, 2004 at 10:14:22PM +0800, Nick Bannon wrote:
> > [snip]
> > >
> > > It's arrived! It's got a basic Debian install and is sitting in the
> > > rack under hydra. Possible fiddling with VLANs tomorrow, in conjunction
> > > with olive, the Cisco 2924XL and later bertoli, the 2912? .
> >
> > How did the VLAN stuff go? Roughly what can those two Cisco devices do?
> > Are they routers, swiches, fibre mulitplexers or something completely
> > different?
>
> Switches. IIRC bertoli only does ISL (Cisco proprietary FLAN stuff), not
> 802.1q or whatever. Could be wrong, someone'll correct me if I am.
Yeah, that's right. Stuff mostly works again now, the main problem I had
was olive (the 2924) not liking the uplink unless it was in trunked mode
(which the uplink isn't at the moment), and then trying to deconfigure the
accelar gracefully. So the uplink now goes to eth1 (the e100), eth0
(e1000) goes to olive with vlans 2 and 3 being machineroom and clubroom
respectively. bertoli needs to be connected up and taught about vlans.
Magic IPs, loft vlan etc still need to be set up, but tftpd and mop work.
Appletalk requires a recompile of the kernel. meito and other things on
the cisco now have working waix again.
--
# TRS-80 trs80(a)ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au #/ "Otherwise Bub here will do \
# UCC Wheel Member http://trs80.ucc.asn.au/ #| what squirrels do best |
[ "There's nobody getting rich writing ]| -- Collect and hide your |
[ software that I know of" -- Bill Gates, 1980 ]\ nuts." -- Acid Reflux #231 /
From davyd at zdlcomputing.com Sat Jun 12 23:12:40 2004
From: davyd at zdlcomputing.com (Davyd Madeley)
Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:54 2004
Subject: [tech] madako, the new PC router
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <1087053160.7724.16.camel@pingu>
On Sat, 2004-06-12 at 23:02 +0800, James Andrewartha wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Matt Johnston wrote:
> Yeah, that's right. Stuff mostly works again now, the main problem I had
> was olive (the 2924) not liking the uplink unless it was in trunked mode
> (which the uplink isn't at the moment), and then trying to deconfigure the
> accelar gracefully. So the uplink now goes to eth1 (the e100), eth0
> (e1000) goes to olive with vlans 2 and 3 being machineroom and clubroom
> respectively. bertoli needs to be connected up and taught about vlans.
> Magic IPs, loft vlan etc still need to be set up, but tftpd and mop work.
> Appletalk requires a recompile of the kernel. meito and other things on
> the cisco now have working waix again.
I apologise for not compiling in AppleTalk, I didn't actually remember
it. You should just be able to compile 2.6.6 using the current config
and appropriate extra bits.
If you get bored, add the IPX modules as well, in case we feel like
adding IPX routing at some point (*evil smirk*).
--d
PS. I'm sure I mailed Tech earlier today, but never saw the email. I
also can't find record of having sent it. I think I am losing my mind...
--
http://davyd.ucc.asn.au/
PGP Fingerprint
08B0 341A 0B9B 08BB 2118 C060 2EDD BB4F 5191 6CDA
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au/pipermail/tech/attachments/20040612/4802b12f/attachment.pgp
From davyd at zdlcomputing.com Sat Jun 12 19:03:21 2004
From: davyd at zdlcomputing.com (Davyd Madeley)
Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:55 2004
Subject: [tech] madako, the new PC router
In-Reply-To: <20040612105655.GC314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
References: <20040326130530.GB186880@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
<20040611141422.GA272297@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
<20040612105655.GC314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
Message-ID: <1087038201.7724.9.camel@pingu>
On Sat, 2004-06-12 at 18:56 +0800, Alastair Irvine wrote:
> On Fri, 11 June, 2004 at 10:14:22PM +0800, Nick Bannon wrote:
> How did the VLAN stuff go? Roughly what can those two Cisco devices do?
> Are they routers, swiches, fibre mulitplexers or something completely
> different?
They are Catalyst switches, support 10/100 ethernet.
One is a Catalyst 2900 series (Grahame says it is infact not a 2912). It
can speak ISL vlans. The other is a Catalyst 2924XL it speaks 802.1Q and
ISL. I _think_ it can map between the two, allowing us to run a .1Q
trunk into the router from the 2924 and have it fed as an ISL trunk to
the 2900.
AFAIK they both run IOS (rather then CatOS) although I don't know what
version.
Ideally at some point, we want to get another Catalyst, probably a 2950
with GigE module that we can connect to the router over a gig trunk.
Then run bonded 200 (or whatever) trunks to the other two switches. But
that is something for the future.
--d
--
http://davyd.ucc.asn.au/
PGP Fingerprint
08B0 341A 0B9B 08BB 2118 C060 2EDD BB4F 5191 6CDA
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au/pipermail/tech/attachments/20040612/f5e2b042/attachment.pgp
From paul at bur.st Sat Jun 12 19:15:45 2004
From: paul at bur.st (Paul Day)
Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:55 2004
Subject: [tech] madako, the new PC router
In-Reply-To: <20040612105655.GC314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
References: <20040326130530.GB186880@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
<20040611141422.GA272297@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
<20040612105655.GC314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
Message-ID:
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Alastair Irvine wrote:
> > It's arrived! It's got a basic Debian install and is sitting in the
> > rack under hydra. Possible fiddling with VLANs tomorrow, in conjunction
> > with olive, the Cisco 2924XL and later bertoli, the 2912? .
>
> How did the VLAN stuff go? Roughly what can those two Cisco devices do?
> Are they routers, swiches, fibre mulitplexers or something completely
> different?
paul@thump:~$ ping www.ucc.asn.au
PING mooneye.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (130.95.13.9): 56 data bytes
--- mooneye.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
Looks like someone's just trying to find out for you. ;)
PD
--
Paul Day Web: www.bur.st/~paul GPG Key ID: 2EF4ED23
From bernard at blackham.com.au Sun Jun 13 02:06:04 2004
From: bernard at blackham.com.au (Bernard Blackham)
Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:56 2004
Subject: serial port; Re: [tech] Duplicate snack machine EPROM burnt
In-Reply-To: <20040612104828.GB314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
References: <20040611135305.GR259163@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
<20040612095757.GA314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
<20040612100510.GH1980@blackham.com.au>
<20040612104828.GB314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
Message-ID: <20040612180604.GI1980@blackham.com.au>
On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 06:48:28PM +0800, Alastair Irvine wrote:
> Damn, those schematics are huge. What is the part number of the IC (main
> processor?) with the serial port in it?
It's some breed of HC12. I don't remember off hand. It's on the
schematics though which are about somewhere (possibly in the
machine?)
Bernard.
--
Bernard Blackham
From bernard at blackham.com.au Sun Jun 13 02:14:21 2004
From: bernard at blackham.com.au (Bernard Blackham)
Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:56 2004
Subject: [tech] madako, the new PC router
In-Reply-To: <1087038201.7724.9.camel@pingu>
References: <20040326130530.GB186880@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
<20040611141422.GA272297@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
<20040612105655.GC314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
<1087038201.7724.9.camel@pingu>
Message-ID: <20040612181421.GJ1980@blackham.com.au>
On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 07:03:21PM +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
> AFAIK they both run IOS (rather then CatOS) although I don't know what
> version.
bertoli runs CatOS. olive runs IOS.
--
Bernard Blackham
From trs80 at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au Mon Jun 14 00:14:42 2004
From: trs80 at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (James Andrewartha)
Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:56 2004
Subject: [tech] madako, the new PC router
In-Reply-To: <1087053160.7724.16.camel@pingu>
Message-ID:
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Davyd Madeley wrote:
> If you get bored, add the IPX modules as well, in case we feel like
> adding IPX routing at some point (*evil smirk*).
No (tm).
> PS. I'm sure I mailed Tech earlier today, but never saw the email. I
> also can't find record of having sent it. I think I am losing my mind...
I turned off mail for the duration, hence some arrived out of otder.
--
# TRS-80 trs80(a)ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au #/ "Otherwise Bub here will do \
# UCC Wheel Member http://trs80.ucc.asn.au/ #| what squirrels do best |
[ "There's nobody getting rich writing ]| -- Collect and hide your |
[ software that I know of" -- Bill Gates, 1980 ]\ nuts." -- Acid Reflux #231 /
From alastair at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au Mon Jun 14 23:05:13 2004
From: alastair at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (Alastair Irvine)
Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:56 2004
Subject: serial port; Re: [tech] Duplicate snack machine EPROM burnt
In-Reply-To: <20040612180604.GI1980@blackham.com.au>
References: <20040611135305.GR259163@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
<20040612095757.GA314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
<20040612100510.GH1980@blackham.com.au>
<20040612104828.GB314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
<20040612180604.GI1980@blackham.com.au>
Message-ID: <20040614150513.GD414503@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
On Sun, 13 June, 2004 at 02:06:04AM +0800, Bernard Blackham wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 06:48:28PM +0800, Alastair Irvine wrote:
> > Damn, those schematics are huge. What is the part number of the IC (main
> > processor?) with the serial port in it?
>
> It's some breed of HC12. I don't remember off hand. It's on the
> schematics though which are about somewhere (possibly in the
> machine?)
Does anyone remember which page? They're on Mark's website, but they're
5Mb each.
--
... It was a brave man that ate the first oyster.
_____________________________________________________________________
| |
| -=*Alastair Irvine*=- |
| C-monkey/wanderer/board&RPGer/net-nut alastair@ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au |
|_____________________________________________________________________|
From probsc01 at tartarus.uwa.edu.au Tue Jun 15 08:13:35 2004
From: probsc01 at tartarus.uwa.edu.au (Christoph Probst)
Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:57 2004
Subject: [tech] New Kernel Crash-Exploit discovered
Message-ID: <20040615001335.GC24938@netzpunkt.org>
FYI.
http://linuxreviews.org/news/2004-06-11_kernel_crash/index.html
Chris
--
George Washington was first in war, first in peace -- and the first to
have his birthday juggled to make a long weekend.
-- Ashley Cooper
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au/pipermail/tech/attachments/20040615/f1f3ee9e/attachment.pgp
From bernard at blackham.com.au Tue Jun 15 13:00:17 2004
From: bernard at blackham.com.au (Bernard Blackham)
Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:57 2004
Subject: [tech] New Kernel Crash-Exploit discovered
In-Reply-To: <20040615001335.GC24938@netzpunkt.org>
References: <20040615001335.GC24938@netzpunkt.org>
Message-ID: <20040615050017.GC2216@blackham.com.au>
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 02:13:35AM +0200, Christoph Probst wrote:
> FYI.
>
> http://linuxreviews.org/news/2004-06-11_kernel_crash/index.html
2.4.26 patch: http://dagobah.ucc.asn.au/fpu-bugfix-2.4.26.diff
It's a port of Andi Kleen's 2.6 patch, which he says doesn't catch
all cases, but it's the best thing yet.
Bernard.
--
Bernard Blackham
From davyd at zdlcomputing.com Tue Jun 15 13:55:46 2004
From: davyd at zdlcomputing.com (Davyd Madeley)
Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:58 2004
Subject: [tech]
Re: [committee] 24 hour warning: This Week's Committee Meeting
Agenda
In-Reply-To: <1087189877.7724.61.camel@pingu>
References: <200406140500.NAA0000395446@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
<1087189877.7724.61.camel@pingu>
Message-ID: <1087278946.4091.1.camel@pingu>
On Mon, 2004-06-14 at 13:11 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
> > trent : Buy 2 cheap beige cases for thinterms to transplant into - heat issues suck too much (i reckon ~$80 ea?)
>
> Do you think this will solve the problem? There is nothing in there to
> overheat. If we are really having thermal issues, let's first look at a
> cheaper option (like installing a case fan of some description). If the
> problem is infact not thermal (like nVidia-crack and some dodgy kernel
> driver) and just looks to be thermal no amount of new case will help us.
>
> Has anyone gotten actual sensor readings from the machines?
I was having a quick gawk at the machines. They are running 2.4.24-grsec
with random things turned on that shouldn't be. I'm sure this can't help
us much. The UniSFA machine is running 2.6.3 and seems to be a lot more
stable. At some point I will build them a copy of 2.6.6 (without crack
like grsec). We'll see how that goes.
--d
--
http://davyd.ucc.asn.au/
PGP Fingerprint
08B0 341A 0B9B 08BB 2118 C060 2EDD BB4F 5191 6CDA
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au/pipermail/tech/attachments/20040615/648ec171/attachment.pgp
From trent at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au Wed Jun 16 08:33:50 2004
From: trent at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (Trent Lloyd)
Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:58 2004
Subject: [tech] Re: [committee] 24 hour warning: This Week's Committee
Meeting Agenda
In-Reply-To: <1087278946.4091.1.camel@pingu>
References: <200406140500.NAA0000395446@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
<1087189877.7724.61.camel@pingu> <1087278946.4091.1.camel@pingu>
Message-ID: <20040616003350.GA478670@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
Hi,
> > > trent : Buy 2 cheap beige cases for thinterms to transplant into - heat issues suck too much (i reckon ~$80 ea?)
> >
> > Do you think this will solve the problem? There is nothing in there to
> > overheat. If we are really having thermal issues, let's first look at a
> > cheaper option (like installing a case fan of some description). If the
> > problem is infact not thermal (like nVidia-crack and some dodgy kernel
Try putting your hand on the case :)
> > driver) and just looks to be thermal no amount of new case will help us.
> >
> > Has anyone gotten actual sensor readings from the machines?
>
> I was having a quick gawk at the machines. They are running 2.4.24-grsec
> with random things turned on that shouldn't be. I'm sure this can't help
> us much. The UniSFA machine is running 2.6.3 and seems to be a lot more
I noticed that, whats grahame running on his?
> stable. At some point I will build them a copy of 2.6.6 (without crack
> like grsec). We'll see how that goes.
Cheers,
Trent
From trent at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au Wed Jun 16 08:36:49 2004
From: trent at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (Trent Lloyd)
Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:58 2004
Subject: [tech] Re: [ucc] Minutes 15/06
In-Reply-To: <20040615064455.GA9309@blackham.com.au>
References: <20040615064455.GA9309@blackham.com.au>
Message-ID: <20040616003649.GB478670@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
> - fileserver: consensus is to combine this with Opteron - people
> will play for a few months, when things are stable, migrate
> things across. pricing is $2000 for a 32-bit machine with SATA.
> to be looked into. continue on tech@.
I was goign to suggest this, it seems like a good idea because it will mean shit-fast access to the drives from the main user machine, and be cheaper.
Cheers,
Trent
From davyd at zdlcomputing.com Wed Jun 16 11:25:00 2004
From: davyd at zdlcomputing.com (Davyd Madeley)
Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:59 2004
Subject: [tech] Re: [committee] 24 hour warning: This Week's Committee
Meeting Agenda
In-Reply-To: <20040616003350.GA478670@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
References: <200406140500.NAA0000395446@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
<1087189877.7724.61.camel@pingu> <1087278946.4091.1.camel@pingu>
<20040616003350.GA478670@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
Message-ID: <1087356300.4091.13.camel@pingu>
On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 08:33 +0800, Trent Lloyd wrote:
> > > Has anyone gotten actual sensor readings from the machines?
> >
> > I was having a quick gawk at the machines. They are running 2.4.24-grsec
> > with random things turned on that shouldn't be. I'm sure this can't help
> > us much. The UniSFA machine is running 2.6.3 and seems to be a lot more
> I noticed that, whats grahame running on his?
Grahame doesn't have one. Grahame's mother has one running Windows, runs
fantastically apparently.
> > stable. At some point I will build them a copy of 2.6.6 (without crack
> > like grsec). We'll see how that goes.
This was done last night. While I can't yet make many comments:
[davyd@pitch davyd]$ uname -a
Linux pitch 2.6.6-thinclient #1 Tue Jun 15 15:36:52 WST 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
[davyd@pitch davyd]$ uptime
11:21:07 up 15:15, 1 user, load average: 0.02, 0.04, 0.08
If someone modprobes i2c-proc on them, we should be able to get sensor
readings. Perhaps we should consider setting up mtrg for them, graphing
sensors readings and uptimes. Just for interests sake.
While 2.6 seems to give overall better performance, we might notice a
drop in frame rate in GL applications. The latest round of nVidia
drivers don't seem to perform as well as some of their predecessors.
--d
--
http://davyd.ucc.asn.au/
PGP Fingerprint
08B0 341A 0B9B 08BB 2118 C060 2EDD BB4F 5191 6CDA
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au/pipermail/tech/attachments/20040616/f6002c54/attachment.pgp
From bernard at blackham.com.au Wed Jun 16 11:57:41 2004
From: bernard at blackham.com.au (Bernard Blackham)
Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:59 2004
Subject: [tech] Re: [committee] 24 hour warning: This Week's Committee
Meeting Agenda
In-Reply-To: <1087356300.4091.13.camel@pingu>
References: <200406140500.NAA0000395446@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
<1087189877.7724.61.camel@pingu> <1087278946.4091.1.camel@pingu>
<20040616003350.GA478670@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
<1087356300.4091.13.camel@pingu>
Message-ID: <20040616035740.GA4647@blackham.com.au>
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 11:25:00AM +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
> If someone modprobes i2c-proc on them, we should be able to get sensor
> readings.
It was already setup (i2c-proc doesnt exist in 2.6 though).
sensors was installed in /usr/local/bin, taking priority in the path
and that version didn't look in /sys.
pitch:
M/B Temp: +40 C (high = +105 C, hyst = +0 C) (beep)
CPU Temp: +48.0 C (high = +127 C, hyst = +127 C) (beep)
velvet:
M/B Temp: +39 C (high = +105 C, hyst = +0 C) (beep)
CPU Temp: +47.5 C (high = +127 C, hyst = +127 C) (beep)
That's not hot.
> While 2.6 seems to give overall better performance, we might notice a
> drop in frame rate in GL applications. The latest round of nVidia
> drivers don't seem to perform as well as some of their predecessors.
They also do bad things(tm) wrt interrupt handlers (see dmesg).
Bernard.
--
Bernard Blackham
From davyd at zdlcomputing.com Wed Jun 16 12:13:40 2004
From: davyd at zdlcomputing.com (Davyd Madeley)
Date: Wed Oct 27 01:29:00 2004
Subject: [tech] Re: [committee] 24 hour warning: This Week's Committee
Meeting Agenda
In-Reply-To: <20040616035740.GA4647@blackham.com.au>
References: <200406140500.NAA0000395446@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
<1087189877.7724.61.camel@pingu> <1087278946.4091.1.camel@pingu>
<20040616003350.GA478670@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
<20040616035740.GA4647@blackham.com.au>
Message-ID: <1087359220.4091.28.camel@pingu>
On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 11:57 +0800, Bernard Blackham wrote:
> It was already setup (i2c-proc doesnt exist in 2.6 though).
> sensors was installed in /usr/local/bin, taking priority in the path
> and that version didn't look in /sys.
Can someone remove the /usr/local version then at some point?
> pitch:
> M/B Temp: +40 C (high = +105 C, hyst = +0 C) (beep)
> CPU Temp: +48.0 C (high = +127 C, hyst = +127 C) (beep)
> velvet:
> M/B Temp: +39 C (high = +105 C, hyst = +0 C) (beep)
> CPU Temp: +47.5 C (high = +127 C, hyst = +127 C) (beep)
>
> That's not hot.
That's really quite mild for an athlon. To be empirical we should trial
them during games of Enemy Territory, we'll see how things go.
> > While 2.6 seems to give overall better performance, we might notice a
> > drop in frame rate in GL applications. The latest round of nVidia
> > drivers don't seem to perform as well as some of their predecessors.
>
> They also do bad things(tm) wrt interrupt handlers (see dmesg).
Interesting. It's the same driver I'm running, but I am not getting
nasty going on. Even though the machine has APIC turned off, we are
nowhere near running out of interrupts.
[davyd@pitch davyd]$ cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0
0: 57925629 XT-PIC timer
1: 36745 XT-PIC i8042
2: 0 XT-PIC cascade
9: 0 XT-PIC acpi
11: 4603365 XT-PIC NVidia nForce, nvidia
15: 8356849 XT-PIC eth0, ohci_hcd, ohci_hcd
I guess this is a cute side-effect of not having any disks in there.
It would be nice to get some mrtg style monitoring on the machines.
Perhaps we can look at that later on in the week.
--d
--
http://davyd.ucc.asn.au/
PGP Fingerprint
08B0 341A 0B9B 08BB 2118 C060 2EDD BB4F 5191 6CDA
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au/pipermail/tech/attachments/20040616/3a4d71f5/attachment.pgp
From bernard at blackham.com.au Wed Jun 16 12:24:38 2004
From: bernard at blackham.com.au (Bernard Blackham)
Date: Wed Oct 27 01:29:00 2004
Subject: [tech] Re: [committee] 24 hour warning: This Week's Committee
Meeting Agenda
In-Reply-To: <1087359220.4091.28.camel@pingu>
References: <200406140500.NAA0000395446@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
<1087189877.7724.61.camel@pingu> <1087278946.4091.1.camel@pingu>
<20040616003350.GA478670@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
<20040616035740.GA4647@blackham.com.au> <1087359220.4091.28.camel@pingu>
Message-ID: <20040616042438.GB4647@blackham.com.au>
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 12:13:40PM +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
> > It was already setup (i2c-proc doesnt exist in 2.6 though).
> > sensors was installed in /usr/local/bin, taking priority in the path
> > and that version didn't look in /sys.
>
> Can someone remove the /usr/local version then at some point?
I've chmodded it -x for now. If we ever go back to a 2.4 kernel then
we'll probably need it again. (Is that why it was there?)
> > They also do bad things(tm) wrt interrupt handlers (see dmesg).
>
> Interesting. It's the same driver I'm running, but I am not getting
> nasty going on. Even though the machine has APIC turned off, we are
> nowhere near running out of interrupts.
> [davyd@pitch davyd]$ cat /proc/interrupts
> CPU0
> 0: 57925629 XT-PIC timer
> 1: 36745 XT-PIC i8042
> 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade
> 9: 0 XT-PIC acpi
> 11: 4603365 XT-PIC NVidia nForce, nvidia
> 15: 8356849 XT-PIC eth0, ohci_hcd, ohci_hcd
>
> I guess this is a cute side-effect of not having any disks in there.
The badness is coming from the fact that the nVidia drivers are
calling functions from within interrupts that they're not supposed
to. I don't see how running out of interrupts or being diskless
correspond to this, but then again, I can't explain why we
pitch/velvet them and you don't :) They don't seem to be harmful yet
anyway.
> It would be nice to get some mrtg style monitoring on the machines.
> Perhaps we can look at that later on in the week.
6 days and I can get something going.
Bernard.
--
Bernard Blackham
From bernard at blackham.com.au Wed Jun 16 21:37:25 2004
From: bernard at blackham.com.au (Bernard Blackham)
Date: Wed Oct 27 01:29:00 2004
Subject: [tech] It beeps!
Message-ID: <20040616133725.GD4647@blackham.com.au>
mtearle and I tried burning my new version of the ROM tonight, and
about 7 tries later, we can get it to beep! I moved the beeping code
into the on-boot assembly instead of the C code. I have a suspicion
that the reason it doesn't do much else, is that I can't setup the
stack correctly. I've never had much success in programs that set up
or move the stack reliably.
If anybody wants to checkout the code from CVS and look if I'm doing
anything silly? - reset vector (in vectors.s) goes to _start. _start
does some fiddling of registers, sets up the stack by:
lds _stack
where _stack is declared in memory.x to be 0x007f - 1 (copied from
another project).
Should this be all that's needed to tell jsr where to put it's
return addresses?
I'll look into it more after exams in 5 days, but if anybody feels
bored in the meantime, there's a starting point.
The next thing I'd like to get working is writing to the display -
this should make debugging *much* easier.
S'all for now.
Bernard.
--
Bernard Blackham
From davyd at zdlcomputing.com Wed Jun 16 21:40:53 2004
From: davyd at zdlcomputing.com (Davyd Madeley)
Date: Wed Oct 27 01:29:01 2004
Subject: [tech] It beeps!
In-Reply-To: <20040616133725.GD4647@blackham.com.au>
References: <20040616133725.GD4647@blackham.com.au>
Message-ID: <1087393253.8492.4.camel@pingu>
On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 21:37 +0800, Bernard Blackham wrote:
> The next thing I'd like to get working is writing to the display -
> this should make debugging *much* easier.
If it helps, I have a HC12 simulator which seems to work ok. I'm not
sure if it's the one Packrat likes or not, but you should be able to see
what's happening in the memory map.
--d
--
http://davyd.ucc.asn.au/
PGP Fingerprint
08B0 341A 0B9B 08BB 2118 C060 2EDD BB4F 5191 6CDA
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au/pipermail/tech/attachments/20040616/7789520f/attachment.pgp
From mfgnigslcgmyjh at fly.cc.fer.hr Fri Jun 18 10:14:43 2004
From: mfgnigslcgmyjh at fly.cc.fer.hr (August Mckee)
Date: Wed Oct 27 01:29:02 2004
Subject: [tech]
get the job you deserve with a university degree - no need to go to school
Message-ID: <5B2A00EFD61B1C27FF.87462@mfgnigslcgmyjh@fly.cc.fer.hr>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au/pipermail/tech/attachments/20040618/06aa3b5b/attachment.html
From bernard at blackham.com.au Sun Jun 20 20:38:45 2004
From: bernard at blackham.com.au (Bernard Blackham)
Date: Wed Oct 27 01:29:02 2004
Subject: [tech] A vending machine that vends? Never!
In-Reply-To: <20040619152335.GF2242@blackham.com.au>
References: <20040619152335.GF2242@blackham.com.au>
Message-ID: <20040620123845.GG2242@blackham.com.au>
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 11:23:35PM +0800, Bernard Blackham wrote:
> - It reads keys 1 and 9 (first key in both rows) - I think I know
> the problem, but won't get time to test until monday night.
Evil gcc optimising the usefulness out of code. Fixed. All keys are
now detected.
> - Motors still haven't moved.
The motors now move (= Home sensors need to be used to tell it where
to stop correctly. (Code is there, but not used yet).
Despite this however, there is now a fairly functional ROM in the
machine that will drop stuff out. Note the contents of the machine
is a couple of months out of code. :)
So all that's left is the home sensors, a serial keypad and the rest
is icing!
Bernard.
--
Bernard Blackham
From nick at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au Tue Jun 22 12:21:52 2004
From: nick at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (Nick Bannon)
Date: Wed Oct 27 01:29:02 2004
Subject: [tech] Rackmount PCs
Message-ID: <20040622042152.GO491414@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
Jamie Moir mentioned that he can get SuperMicro cases. They're not dirt
cheap, but they're compact and they have real hot swappable HDD trays.
They come alone and in combos with motherboards. The prices below,
including GST, are for the bare bones system - no drives at all. The
more expensive ones come with a motherboard.
SC813T-500: $890
http://www.supermicro.com/products/chassis/1U/813/SC813T-500.cfm
SC813T-500: $979?
http://www.supermicro.com/products/chassis/1U/813/SC813T-500C.cfm
5013C-T: $1000
http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1U/5013/SYS-5013C-T.cfm
Two drives, P4 motherboard
5013C-MT: $1250
http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1U/5013/SYS-5013C-MT.cfm
P4 motherboard with dual gigabit onboard and 64-bit PCI-X!
6013P-T: $1735
http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1U/6013/SYS-6013P-T.cfm
Dual Xeon board, cheaper than Dell! (Then again, what prices are UCS
getting on Dells?)
Nick.
--
Nick Bannon | "I made this letter longer than usual because
nick-sig@rcpt.to | I lack the time to make it shorter." - Pascal
From grahame at angrygoats.net Tue Jun 22 14:19:23 2004
From: grahame at angrygoats.net (Grahame Bowland)
Date: Wed Oct 27 01:29:02 2004
Subject: [tech] Rackmount PCs
In-Reply-To: <20040622042152.GO491414@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
References: <20040622042152.GO491414@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>
Message-ID: <1087885163.5363.115.camel@typhaon.ucs.uwa.edu.au>
On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 12:21, Nick Bannon wrote:
> Jamie Moir mentioned that he can get SuperMicro cases. They're not dirt
> cheap, but they're compact and they have real hot swappable HDD trays.
> They come alone and in combos with motherboards. The prices below,
> including GST, are for the bare bones system - no drives at all. The
> more expensive ones come with a motherboard.
> 6013P-T: $1735
> http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1U/6013/SYS-6013P-T.cfm
> Dual Xeon board, cheaper than Dell! (Then again, what prices are UCS
> getting on Dells?)
Most vendors it seems a dual Xeon is worth just under $10k with 4Gb of
RAM and five 130Gb SCSI disks. Dell are in that range.. we're getting a
single 3.2Ghz P4 and 2Gb of RAM + 2 * 80Gb SATA disks for about $2.5k.
Those sort of machines are being used for the webmail.
The Dell Xeons come with excessive numbers of blue LEDs, nice management
that mostly can be used from within Linux, a decent hardware RAID
controller, hotswap SCSI, fans, PSUs...
From bernard at blackham.com.au Wed Jun 23 14:49:36 2004
From: bernard at blackham.com.au (Bernard Blackham)
Date: Wed Oct 27 01:29:02 2004
Subject: [tech] mailman weirdness
Message-ID: <20040623064936.GE9951@blackham.com.au>
Mailman started playing up around 12:30 today due to some stale lock
files. It should be working again now, but if any emails were sent
to ucc lists that never made it, you will probably need to resend
it.
Bernard.
--
Bernard Blackham