From nick at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au Fri Jun 11 21:53:05 2004 From: nick at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (Nick Bannon) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:49 2004 Subject: [tech] Duplicate snack machine EPROM burnt Message-ID: <20040611135305.GR259163@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> [MTL] picked up a fistful of blank 27C256 EPROMs from [DAV] today. We successfully read the snack machine original and burnt a duplicate which the snack machine happily ran on. Next up: * networking the DOS PC with the EPROM burner; * assembling a replacement ROM; * running serial cables to the snack machine for testing - the "printer" port and the possibly dead coin mechanism. Nick. -- Nick Bannon | "I made this letter longer than usual because nick-sig@rcpt.to | I lack the time to make it shorter." - Pascal From nick at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au Fri Jun 11 22:14:22 2004 From: nick at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (Nick Bannon) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:51 2004 Subject: [tech] madako, the new PC router In-Reply-To: <20040326130530.GB186880@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> References: <20040326130530.GB186880@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> Message-ID: <20040611141422.GA272297@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 09:05:31PM +0800, Matt Johnston wrote: [...] > INTEL P4-2.8Ghz/512k/0.13U/SOCKET 478/NORTHWOOD/533MHZ FSB $246 > INTEL BLKD865GLCLK D865G/800FSB/3PCI/uATX/DDR400/AGP8X+Gfx/8xUSB2/GIG LAN/SATA $183 > 256MB PC3200 400MHz DDR Ram $66 > SEAGATE ST340015A BARRACUDA 5400.1/40GB/5400RPM/12.5MS/445MB/ATA-100/2MB/1YR W $79 > Network Card Intel EE Pro PCI 10/100TX Adapter OEM $68 > Skyhawk IPC-2025 2RU casing $388 > > Total: $1030 It's arrived! It's got a basic Debian install and is sitting in the rack under hydra. Possible fiddling with VLANs tomorrow, in conjunction with olive, the Cisco 2924XL and later bertoli, the 2912? . Nick. -- Nick Bannon | "I made this letter longer than usual because nick-sig@rcpt.to | I lack the time to make it shorter." - Pascal From alastair at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au Sat Jun 12 17:57:57 2004 From: alastair at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (Alastair Irvine) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:52 2004 Subject: [tech] Duplicate snack machine EPROM burnt In-Reply-To: <20040611135305.GR259163@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> References: <20040611135305.GR259163@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> Message-ID: <20040612095757.GA314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> When will the next bunch of work be done on the snack machine? Is there any stuff I can do towards the ROM image in the meantime? -- ... "Say, does anyone know a restaurant where they serve penguin?" -- Guy Dyson _____________________________________________________________________ | | | -=*Alastair Irvine*=- | | C-monkey/wanderer/board&RPGer/net-nut alastair@ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au | |_____________________________________________________________________| From bernard at blackham.com.au Sat Jun 12 18:05:10 2004 From: bernard at blackham.com.au (Bernard Blackham) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:52 2004 Subject: [tech] Duplicate snack machine EPROM burnt In-Reply-To: <20040612095757.GA314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> References: <20040611135305.GR259163@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> <20040612095757.GA314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> Message-ID: <20040612100510.GH1980@blackham.com.au> On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 05:57:57PM +0800, Alastair Irvine wrote: > When will the next bunch of work be done on the snack machine? Is there > any stuff I can do towards the ROM image in the meantime? The new ROM image needs to be modified to use the inbuilt serial port to chat (instead of the hypothetical 16550 that it's been taught to use). Code is in CVS. My exams finish in about 2 weeks, so I'll be back on it then. Bernard. -- Bernard Blackham From alastair at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au Sat Jun 12 18:48:28 2004 From: alastair at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (Alastair Irvine) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:52 2004 Subject: serial port; Re: [tech] Duplicate snack machine EPROM burnt In-Reply-To: <20040612100510.GH1980@blackham.com.au> References: <20040611135305.GR259163@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> <20040612095757.GA314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> <20040612100510.GH1980@blackham.com.au> Message-ID: <20040612104828.GB314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> On Sat, 12 June, 2004 at 06:05:10PM +0800, Bernard Blackham wrote: > On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 05:57:57PM +0800, Alastair Irvine wrote: > > When will the next bunch of work be done on the snack machine? Is there > > any stuff I can do towards the ROM image in the meantime? > > The new ROM image needs to be modified to use the inbuilt serial > port to chat (instead of the hypothetical 16550 that it's been > taught to use). Damn, those schematics are huge. What is the part number of the IC (main processor?) with the serial port in it? > > Code is in CVS. http://cvs.ucc.asn.au/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/projects/openvend/ > > My exams finish in about 2 weeks, so I'll be back on it then. -- ... How come wrong numbers are never busy? _____________________________________________________________________ | | | -=*Alastair Irvine*=- | | C-monkey/wanderer/board&RPGer/net-nut alastair@ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au | |_____________________________________________________________________| From alastair at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au Sat Jun 12 18:56:55 2004 From: alastair at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (Alastair Irvine) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:53 2004 Subject: [tech] madako, the new PC router In-Reply-To: <20040611141422.GA272297@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> References: <20040326130530.GB186880@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> <20040611141422.GA272297@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> Message-ID: <20040612105655.GC314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> On Fri, 11 June, 2004 at 10:14:22PM +0800, Nick Bannon wrote: [snip] > > It's arrived! It's got a basic Debian install and is sitting in the > rack under hydra. Possible fiddling with VLANs tomorrow, in conjunction > with olive, the Cisco 2924XL and later bertoli, the 2912? . How did the VLAN stuff go? Roughly what can those two Cisco devices do? Are they routers, swiches, fibre mulitplexers or something completely different? -- ... We are in bondage to the law so that we may be free. _____________________________________________________________________ | | | -=*Alastair Irvine*=- | | C-monkey/wanderer/board&RPGer/net-nut alastair@ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au | |_____________________________________________________________________| From matt at ucc.asn.au Sat Jun 12 19:00:54 2004 From: matt at ucc.asn.au (Matt Johnston) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:53 2004 Subject: [tech] madako, the new PC router In-Reply-To: <20040612105655.GC314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> References: <20040326130530.GB186880@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> <20040611141422.GA272297@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> <20040612105655.GC314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> Message-ID: <20040612110053.GE219587@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 06:56:55PM +0800, Alastair Irvine wrote: > On Fri, 11 June, 2004 at 10:14:22PM +0800, Nick Bannon wrote: > [snip] > > > > It's arrived! It's got a basic Debian install and is sitting in the > > rack under hydra. Possible fiddling with VLANs tomorrow, in conjunction > > with olive, the Cisco 2924XL and later bertoli, the 2912? . > > How did the VLAN stuff go? Roughly what can those two Cisco devices do? > Are they routers, swiches, fibre mulitplexers or something completely > different? Switches. IIRC bertoli only does ISL (Cisco proprietary FLAN stuff), not 802.1q or whatever. Could be wrong, someone'll correct me if I am. Matt From trs80 at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au Sat Jun 12 23:02:07 2004 From: trs80 at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (James Andrewartha) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:53 2004 Subject: [tech] madako, the new PC router In-Reply-To: <20040612110053.GE219587@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> Message-ID: On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Matt Johnston wrote: > On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 06:56:55PM +0800, Alastair Irvine wrote: > > On Fri, 11 June, 2004 at 10:14:22PM +0800, Nick Bannon wrote: > > [snip] > > > > > > It's arrived! It's got a basic Debian install and is sitting in the > > > rack under hydra. Possible fiddling with VLANs tomorrow, in conjunction > > > with olive, the Cisco 2924XL and later bertoli, the 2912? . > > > > How did the VLAN stuff go? Roughly what can those two Cisco devices do? > > Are they routers, swiches, fibre mulitplexers or something completely > > different? > > Switches. IIRC bertoli only does ISL (Cisco proprietary FLAN stuff), not > 802.1q or whatever. Could be wrong, someone'll correct me if I am. Yeah, that's right. Stuff mostly works again now, the main problem I had was olive (the 2924) not liking the uplink unless it was in trunked mode (which the uplink isn't at the moment), and then trying to deconfigure the accelar gracefully. So the uplink now goes to eth1 (the e100), eth0 (e1000) goes to olive with vlans 2 and 3 being machineroom and clubroom respectively. bertoli needs to be connected up and taught about vlans. Magic IPs, loft vlan etc still need to be set up, but tftpd and mop work. Appletalk requires a recompile of the kernel. meito and other things on the cisco now have working waix again. -- # TRS-80 trs80(a)ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au #/ "Otherwise Bub here will do \ # UCC Wheel Member http://trs80.ucc.asn.au/ #| what squirrels do best | [ "There's nobody getting rich writing ]| -- Collect and hide your | [ software that I know of" -- Bill Gates, 1980 ]\ nuts." -- Acid Reflux #231 / From davyd at zdlcomputing.com Sat Jun 12 23:12:40 2004 From: davyd at zdlcomputing.com (Davyd Madeley) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:54 2004 Subject: [tech] madako, the new PC router In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1087053160.7724.16.camel@pingu> On Sat, 2004-06-12 at 23:02 +0800, James Andrewartha wrote: > On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Matt Johnston wrote: > Yeah, that's right. Stuff mostly works again now, the main problem I had > was olive (the 2924) not liking the uplink unless it was in trunked mode > (which the uplink isn't at the moment), and then trying to deconfigure the > accelar gracefully. So the uplink now goes to eth1 (the e100), eth0 > (e1000) goes to olive with vlans 2 and 3 being machineroom and clubroom > respectively. bertoli needs to be connected up and taught about vlans. > Magic IPs, loft vlan etc still need to be set up, but tftpd and mop work. > Appletalk requires a recompile of the kernel. meito and other things on > the cisco now have working waix again. I apologise for not compiling in AppleTalk, I didn't actually remember it. You should just be able to compile 2.6.6 using the current config and appropriate extra bits. If you get bored, add the IPX modules as well, in case we feel like adding IPX routing at some point (*evil smirk*). --d PS. I'm sure I mailed Tech earlier today, but never saw the email. I also can't find record of having sent it. I think I am losing my mind... -- http://davyd.ucc.asn.au/ PGP Fingerprint 08B0 341A 0B9B 08BB 2118 C060 2EDD BB4F 5191 6CDA -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 227 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au/pipermail/tech/attachments/20040612/4802b12f/attachment.pgp From davyd at zdlcomputing.com Sat Jun 12 19:03:21 2004 From: davyd at zdlcomputing.com (Davyd Madeley) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:55 2004 Subject: [tech] madako, the new PC router In-Reply-To: <20040612105655.GC314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> References: <20040326130530.GB186880@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> <20040611141422.GA272297@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> <20040612105655.GC314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> Message-ID: <1087038201.7724.9.camel@pingu> On Sat, 2004-06-12 at 18:56 +0800, Alastair Irvine wrote: > On Fri, 11 June, 2004 at 10:14:22PM +0800, Nick Bannon wrote: > How did the VLAN stuff go? Roughly what can those two Cisco devices do? > Are they routers, swiches, fibre mulitplexers or something completely > different? They are Catalyst switches, support 10/100 ethernet. One is a Catalyst 2900 series (Grahame says it is infact not a 2912). It can speak ISL vlans. The other is a Catalyst 2924XL it speaks 802.1Q and ISL. I _think_ it can map between the two, allowing us to run a .1Q trunk into the router from the 2924 and have it fed as an ISL trunk to the 2900. AFAIK they both run IOS (rather then CatOS) although I don't know what version. Ideally at some point, we want to get another Catalyst, probably a 2950 with GigE module that we can connect to the router over a gig trunk. Then run bonded 200 (or whatever) trunks to the other two switches. But that is something for the future. --d -- http://davyd.ucc.asn.au/ PGP Fingerprint 08B0 341A 0B9B 08BB 2118 C060 2EDD BB4F 5191 6CDA -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 227 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au/pipermail/tech/attachments/20040612/f5e2b042/attachment.pgp From paul at bur.st Sat Jun 12 19:15:45 2004 From: paul at bur.st (Paul Day) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:55 2004 Subject: [tech] madako, the new PC router In-Reply-To: <20040612105655.GC314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> References: <20040326130530.GB186880@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> <20040611141422.GA272297@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> <20040612105655.GC314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> Message-ID: On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Alastair Irvine wrote: > > It's arrived! It's got a basic Debian install and is sitting in the > > rack under hydra. Possible fiddling with VLANs tomorrow, in conjunction > > with olive, the Cisco 2924XL and later bertoli, the 2912? . > > How did the VLAN stuff go? Roughly what can those two Cisco devices do? > Are they routers, swiches, fibre mulitplexers or something completely > different? paul@thump:~$ ping www.ucc.asn.au PING mooneye.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (130.95.13.9): 56 data bytes --- mooneye.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss Looks like someone's just trying to find out for you. ;) PD -- Paul Day Web: www.bur.st/~paul GPG Key ID: 2EF4ED23 From bernard at blackham.com.au Sun Jun 13 02:06:04 2004 From: bernard at blackham.com.au (Bernard Blackham) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:56 2004 Subject: serial port; Re: [tech] Duplicate snack machine EPROM burnt In-Reply-To: <20040612104828.GB314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> References: <20040611135305.GR259163@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> <20040612095757.GA314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> <20040612100510.GH1980@blackham.com.au> <20040612104828.GB314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> Message-ID: <20040612180604.GI1980@blackham.com.au> On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 06:48:28PM +0800, Alastair Irvine wrote: > Damn, those schematics are huge. What is the part number of the IC (main > processor?) with the serial port in it? It's some breed of HC12. I don't remember off hand. It's on the schematics though which are about somewhere (possibly in the machine?) Bernard. -- Bernard Blackham From bernard at blackham.com.au Sun Jun 13 02:14:21 2004 From: bernard at blackham.com.au (Bernard Blackham) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:56 2004 Subject: [tech] madako, the new PC router In-Reply-To: <1087038201.7724.9.camel@pingu> References: <20040326130530.GB186880@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> <20040611141422.GA272297@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> <20040612105655.GC314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> <1087038201.7724.9.camel@pingu> Message-ID: <20040612181421.GJ1980@blackham.com.au> On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 07:03:21PM +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote: > AFAIK they both run IOS (rather then CatOS) although I don't know what > version. bertoli runs CatOS. olive runs IOS. -- Bernard Blackham From trs80 at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au Mon Jun 14 00:14:42 2004 From: trs80 at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (James Andrewartha) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:56 2004 Subject: [tech] madako, the new PC router In-Reply-To: <1087053160.7724.16.camel@pingu> Message-ID: On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Davyd Madeley wrote: > If you get bored, add the IPX modules as well, in case we feel like > adding IPX routing at some point (*evil smirk*). No (tm). > PS. I'm sure I mailed Tech earlier today, but never saw the email. I > also can't find record of having sent it. I think I am losing my mind... I turned off mail for the duration, hence some arrived out of otder. -- # TRS-80 trs80(a)ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au #/ "Otherwise Bub here will do \ # UCC Wheel Member http://trs80.ucc.asn.au/ #| what squirrels do best | [ "There's nobody getting rich writing ]| -- Collect and hide your | [ software that I know of" -- Bill Gates, 1980 ]\ nuts." -- Acid Reflux #231 / From alastair at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au Mon Jun 14 23:05:13 2004 From: alastair at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (Alastair Irvine) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:56 2004 Subject: serial port; Re: [tech] Duplicate snack machine EPROM burnt In-Reply-To: <20040612180604.GI1980@blackham.com.au> References: <20040611135305.GR259163@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> <20040612095757.GA314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> <20040612100510.GH1980@blackham.com.au> <20040612104828.GB314985@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> <20040612180604.GI1980@blackham.com.au> Message-ID: <20040614150513.GD414503@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> On Sun, 13 June, 2004 at 02:06:04AM +0800, Bernard Blackham wrote: > On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 06:48:28PM +0800, Alastair Irvine wrote: > > Damn, those schematics are huge. What is the part number of the IC (main > > processor?) with the serial port in it? > > It's some breed of HC12. I don't remember off hand. It's on the > schematics though which are about somewhere (possibly in the > machine?) Does anyone remember which page? They're on Mark's website, but they're 5Mb each. -- ... It was a brave man that ate the first oyster. _____________________________________________________________________ | | | -=*Alastair Irvine*=- | | C-monkey/wanderer/board&RPGer/net-nut alastair@ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au | |_____________________________________________________________________| From probsc01 at tartarus.uwa.edu.au Tue Jun 15 08:13:35 2004 From: probsc01 at tartarus.uwa.edu.au (Christoph Probst) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:57 2004 Subject: [tech] New Kernel Crash-Exploit discovered Message-ID: <20040615001335.GC24938@netzpunkt.org> FYI. http://linuxreviews.org/news/2004-06-11_kernel_crash/index.html Chris -- George Washington was first in war, first in peace -- and the first to have his birthday juggled to make a long weekend. -- Ashley Cooper -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au/pipermail/tech/attachments/20040615/f1f3ee9e/attachment.pgp From bernard at blackham.com.au Tue Jun 15 13:00:17 2004 From: bernard at blackham.com.au (Bernard Blackham) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:57 2004 Subject: [tech] New Kernel Crash-Exploit discovered In-Reply-To: <20040615001335.GC24938@netzpunkt.org> References: <20040615001335.GC24938@netzpunkt.org> Message-ID: <20040615050017.GC2216@blackham.com.au> On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 02:13:35AM +0200, Christoph Probst wrote: > FYI. > > http://linuxreviews.org/news/2004-06-11_kernel_crash/index.html 2.4.26 patch: http://dagobah.ucc.asn.au/fpu-bugfix-2.4.26.diff It's a port of Andi Kleen's 2.6 patch, which he says doesn't catch all cases, but it's the best thing yet. Bernard. -- Bernard Blackham From davyd at zdlcomputing.com Tue Jun 15 13:55:46 2004 From: davyd at zdlcomputing.com (Davyd Madeley) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:58 2004 Subject: [tech] Re: [committee] 24 hour warning: This Week's Committee Meeting Agenda In-Reply-To: <1087189877.7724.61.camel@pingu> References: <200406140500.NAA0000395446@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> <1087189877.7724.61.camel@pingu> Message-ID: <1087278946.4091.1.camel@pingu> On Mon, 2004-06-14 at 13:11 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote: > > trent : Buy 2 cheap beige cases for thinterms to transplant into - heat issues suck too much (i reckon ~$80 ea?) > > Do you think this will solve the problem? There is nothing in there to > overheat. If we are really having thermal issues, let's first look at a > cheaper option (like installing a case fan of some description). If the > problem is infact not thermal (like nVidia-crack and some dodgy kernel > driver) and just looks to be thermal no amount of new case will help us. > > Has anyone gotten actual sensor readings from the machines? I was having a quick gawk at the machines. They are running 2.4.24-grsec with random things turned on that shouldn't be. I'm sure this can't help us much. The UniSFA machine is running 2.6.3 and seems to be a lot more stable. At some point I will build them a copy of 2.6.6 (without crack like grsec). We'll see how that goes. --d -- http://davyd.ucc.asn.au/ PGP Fingerprint 08B0 341A 0B9B 08BB 2118 C060 2EDD BB4F 5191 6CDA -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 227 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au/pipermail/tech/attachments/20040615/648ec171/attachment.pgp From trent at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au Wed Jun 16 08:33:50 2004 From: trent at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (Trent Lloyd) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:58 2004 Subject: [tech] Re: [committee] 24 hour warning: This Week's Committee Meeting Agenda In-Reply-To: <1087278946.4091.1.camel@pingu> References: <200406140500.NAA0000395446@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> <1087189877.7724.61.camel@pingu> <1087278946.4091.1.camel@pingu> Message-ID: <20040616003350.GA478670@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> Hi, > > > trent : Buy 2 cheap beige cases for thinterms to transplant into - heat issues suck too much (i reckon ~$80 ea?) > > > > Do you think this will solve the problem? There is nothing in there to > > overheat. If we are really having thermal issues, let's first look at a > > cheaper option (like installing a case fan of some description). If the > > problem is infact not thermal (like nVidia-crack and some dodgy kernel Try putting your hand on the case :) > > driver) and just looks to be thermal no amount of new case will help us. > > > > Has anyone gotten actual sensor readings from the machines? > > I was having a quick gawk at the machines. They are running 2.4.24-grsec > with random things turned on that shouldn't be. I'm sure this can't help > us much. The UniSFA machine is running 2.6.3 and seems to be a lot more I noticed that, whats grahame running on his? > stable. At some point I will build them a copy of 2.6.6 (without crack > like grsec). We'll see how that goes. Cheers, Trent From trent at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au Wed Jun 16 08:36:49 2004 From: trent at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (Trent Lloyd) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:58 2004 Subject: [tech] Re: [ucc] Minutes 15/06 In-Reply-To: <20040615064455.GA9309@blackham.com.au> References: <20040615064455.GA9309@blackham.com.au> Message-ID: <20040616003649.GB478670@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> > - fileserver: consensus is to combine this with Opteron - people > will play for a few months, when things are stable, migrate > things across. pricing is $2000 for a 32-bit machine with SATA. > to be looked into. continue on tech@. I was goign to suggest this, it seems like a good idea because it will mean shit-fast access to the drives from the main user machine, and be cheaper. Cheers, Trent From davyd at zdlcomputing.com Wed Jun 16 11:25:00 2004 From: davyd at zdlcomputing.com (Davyd Madeley) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:59 2004 Subject: [tech] Re: [committee] 24 hour warning: This Week's Committee Meeting Agenda In-Reply-To: <20040616003350.GA478670@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> References: <200406140500.NAA0000395446@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> <1087189877.7724.61.camel@pingu> <1087278946.4091.1.camel@pingu> <20040616003350.GA478670@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> Message-ID: <1087356300.4091.13.camel@pingu> On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 08:33 +0800, Trent Lloyd wrote: > > > Has anyone gotten actual sensor readings from the machines? > > > > I was having a quick gawk at the machines. They are running 2.4.24-grsec > > with random things turned on that shouldn't be. I'm sure this can't help > > us much. The UniSFA machine is running 2.6.3 and seems to be a lot more > I noticed that, whats grahame running on his? Grahame doesn't have one. Grahame's mother has one running Windows, runs fantastically apparently. > > stable. At some point I will build them a copy of 2.6.6 (without crack > > like grsec). We'll see how that goes. This was done last night. While I can't yet make many comments: [davyd@pitch davyd]$ uname -a Linux pitch 2.6.6-thinclient #1 Tue Jun 15 15:36:52 WST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux [davyd@pitch davyd]$ uptime 11:21:07 up 15:15, 1 user, load average: 0.02, 0.04, 0.08 If someone modprobes i2c-proc on them, we should be able to get sensor readings. Perhaps we should consider setting up mtrg for them, graphing sensors readings and uptimes. Just for interests sake. While 2.6 seems to give overall better performance, we might notice a drop in frame rate in GL applications. The latest round of nVidia drivers don't seem to perform as well as some of their predecessors. --d -- http://davyd.ucc.asn.au/ PGP Fingerprint 08B0 341A 0B9B 08BB 2118 C060 2EDD BB4F 5191 6CDA -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 227 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au/pipermail/tech/attachments/20040616/f6002c54/attachment.pgp From bernard at blackham.com.au Wed Jun 16 11:57:41 2004 From: bernard at blackham.com.au (Bernard Blackham) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:28:59 2004 Subject: [tech] Re: [committee] 24 hour warning: This Week's Committee Meeting Agenda In-Reply-To: <1087356300.4091.13.camel@pingu> References: <200406140500.NAA0000395446@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> <1087189877.7724.61.camel@pingu> <1087278946.4091.1.camel@pingu> <20040616003350.GA478670@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> <1087356300.4091.13.camel@pingu> Message-ID: <20040616035740.GA4647@blackham.com.au> On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 11:25:00AM +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote: > If someone modprobes i2c-proc on them, we should be able to get sensor > readings. It was already setup (i2c-proc doesnt exist in 2.6 though). sensors was installed in /usr/local/bin, taking priority in the path and that version didn't look in /sys. pitch: M/B Temp: +40 C (high = +105 C, hyst = +0 C) (beep) CPU Temp: +48.0 C (high = +127 C, hyst = +127 C) (beep) velvet: M/B Temp: +39 C (high = +105 C, hyst = +0 C) (beep) CPU Temp: +47.5 C (high = +127 C, hyst = +127 C) (beep) That's not hot. > While 2.6 seems to give overall better performance, we might notice a > drop in frame rate in GL applications. The latest round of nVidia > drivers don't seem to perform as well as some of their predecessors. They also do bad things(tm) wrt interrupt handlers (see dmesg). Bernard. -- Bernard Blackham From davyd at zdlcomputing.com Wed Jun 16 12:13:40 2004 From: davyd at zdlcomputing.com (Davyd Madeley) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:29:00 2004 Subject: [tech] Re: [committee] 24 hour warning: This Week's Committee Meeting Agenda In-Reply-To: <20040616035740.GA4647@blackham.com.au> References: <200406140500.NAA0000395446@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> <1087189877.7724.61.camel@pingu> <1087278946.4091.1.camel@pingu> <20040616003350.GA478670@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> <20040616035740.GA4647@blackham.com.au> Message-ID: <1087359220.4091.28.camel@pingu> On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 11:57 +0800, Bernard Blackham wrote: > It was already setup (i2c-proc doesnt exist in 2.6 though). > sensors was installed in /usr/local/bin, taking priority in the path > and that version didn't look in /sys. Can someone remove the /usr/local version then at some point? > pitch: > M/B Temp: +40 C (high = +105 C, hyst = +0 C) (beep) > CPU Temp: +48.0 C (high = +127 C, hyst = +127 C) (beep) > velvet: > M/B Temp: +39 C (high = +105 C, hyst = +0 C) (beep) > CPU Temp: +47.5 C (high = +127 C, hyst = +127 C) (beep) > > That's not hot. That's really quite mild for an athlon. To be empirical we should trial them during games of Enemy Territory, we'll see how things go. > > While 2.6 seems to give overall better performance, we might notice a > > drop in frame rate in GL applications. The latest round of nVidia > > drivers don't seem to perform as well as some of their predecessors. > > They also do bad things(tm) wrt interrupt handlers (see dmesg). Interesting. It's the same driver I'm running, but I am not getting nasty going on. Even though the machine has APIC turned off, we are nowhere near running out of interrupts. [davyd@pitch davyd]$ cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 0: 57925629 XT-PIC timer 1: 36745 XT-PIC i8042 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade 9: 0 XT-PIC acpi 11: 4603365 XT-PIC NVidia nForce, nvidia 15: 8356849 XT-PIC eth0, ohci_hcd, ohci_hcd I guess this is a cute side-effect of not having any disks in there. It would be nice to get some mrtg style monitoring on the machines. Perhaps we can look at that later on in the week. --d -- http://davyd.ucc.asn.au/ PGP Fingerprint 08B0 341A 0B9B 08BB 2118 C060 2EDD BB4F 5191 6CDA -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 227 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au/pipermail/tech/attachments/20040616/3a4d71f5/attachment.pgp From bernard at blackham.com.au Wed Jun 16 12:24:38 2004 From: bernard at blackham.com.au (Bernard Blackham) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:29:00 2004 Subject: [tech] Re: [committee] 24 hour warning: This Week's Committee Meeting Agenda In-Reply-To: <1087359220.4091.28.camel@pingu> References: <200406140500.NAA0000395446@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> <1087189877.7724.61.camel@pingu> <1087278946.4091.1.camel@pingu> <20040616003350.GA478670@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> <20040616035740.GA4647@blackham.com.au> <1087359220.4091.28.camel@pingu> Message-ID: <20040616042438.GB4647@blackham.com.au> On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 12:13:40PM +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote: > > It was already setup (i2c-proc doesnt exist in 2.6 though). > > sensors was installed in /usr/local/bin, taking priority in the path > > and that version didn't look in /sys. > > Can someone remove the /usr/local version then at some point? I've chmodded it -x for now. If we ever go back to a 2.4 kernel then we'll probably need it again. (Is that why it was there?) > > They also do bad things(tm) wrt interrupt handlers (see dmesg). > > Interesting. It's the same driver I'm running, but I am not getting > nasty going on. Even though the machine has APIC turned off, we are > nowhere near running out of interrupts. > [davyd@pitch davyd]$ cat /proc/interrupts > CPU0 > 0: 57925629 XT-PIC timer > 1: 36745 XT-PIC i8042 > 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade > 9: 0 XT-PIC acpi > 11: 4603365 XT-PIC NVidia nForce, nvidia > 15: 8356849 XT-PIC eth0, ohci_hcd, ohci_hcd > > I guess this is a cute side-effect of not having any disks in there. The badness is coming from the fact that the nVidia drivers are calling functions from within interrupts that they're not supposed to. I don't see how running out of interrupts or being diskless correspond to this, but then again, I can't explain why we pitch/velvet them and you don't :) They don't seem to be harmful yet anyway. > It would be nice to get some mrtg style monitoring on the machines. > Perhaps we can look at that later on in the week. 6 days and I can get something going. Bernard. -- Bernard Blackham From bernard at blackham.com.au Wed Jun 16 21:37:25 2004 From: bernard at blackham.com.au (Bernard Blackham) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:29:00 2004 Subject: [tech] It beeps! Message-ID: <20040616133725.GD4647@blackham.com.au> mtearle and I tried burning my new version of the ROM tonight, and about 7 tries later, we can get it to beep! I moved the beeping code into the on-boot assembly instead of the C code. I have a suspicion that the reason it doesn't do much else, is that I can't setup the stack correctly. I've never had much success in programs that set up or move the stack reliably. If anybody wants to checkout the code from CVS and look if I'm doing anything silly? - reset vector (in vectors.s) goes to _start. _start does some fiddling of registers, sets up the stack by: lds _stack where _stack is declared in memory.x to be 0x007f - 1 (copied from another project). Should this be all that's needed to tell jsr where to put it's return addresses? I'll look into it more after exams in 5 days, but if anybody feels bored in the meantime, there's a starting point. The next thing I'd like to get working is writing to the display - this should make debugging *much* easier. S'all for now. Bernard. -- Bernard Blackham From davyd at zdlcomputing.com Wed Jun 16 21:40:53 2004 From: davyd at zdlcomputing.com (Davyd Madeley) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:29:01 2004 Subject: [tech] It beeps! In-Reply-To: <20040616133725.GD4647@blackham.com.au> References: <20040616133725.GD4647@blackham.com.au> Message-ID: <1087393253.8492.4.camel@pingu> On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 21:37 +0800, Bernard Blackham wrote: > The next thing I'd like to get working is writing to the display - > this should make debugging *much* easier. If it helps, I have a HC12 simulator which seems to work ok. I'm not sure if it's the one Packrat likes or not, but you should be able to see what's happening in the memory map. --d -- http://davyd.ucc.asn.au/ PGP Fingerprint 08B0 341A 0B9B 08BB 2118 C060 2EDD BB4F 5191 6CDA -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 227 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au/pipermail/tech/attachments/20040616/7789520f/attachment.pgp From mfgnigslcgmyjh at fly.cc.fer.hr Fri Jun 18 10:14:43 2004 From: mfgnigslcgmyjh at fly.cc.fer.hr (August Mckee) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:29:02 2004 Subject: [tech] get the job you deserve with a university degree - no need to go to school Message-ID: <5B2A00EFD61B1C27FF.87462@mfgnigslcgmyjh@fly.cc.fer.hr> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au/pipermail/tech/attachments/20040618/06aa3b5b/attachment.html From bernard at blackham.com.au Sun Jun 20 20:38:45 2004 From: bernard at blackham.com.au (Bernard Blackham) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:29:02 2004 Subject: [tech] A vending machine that vends? Never! In-Reply-To: <20040619152335.GF2242@blackham.com.au> References: <20040619152335.GF2242@blackham.com.au> Message-ID: <20040620123845.GG2242@blackham.com.au> On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 11:23:35PM +0800, Bernard Blackham wrote: > - It reads keys 1 and 9 (first key in both rows) - I think I know > the problem, but won't get time to test until monday night. Evil gcc optimising the usefulness out of code. Fixed. All keys are now detected. > - Motors still haven't moved. The motors now move (= Home sensors need to be used to tell it where to stop correctly. (Code is there, but not used yet). Despite this however, there is now a fairly functional ROM in the machine that will drop stuff out. Note the contents of the machine is a couple of months out of code. :) So all that's left is the home sensors, a serial keypad and the rest is icing! Bernard. -- Bernard Blackham From nick at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au Tue Jun 22 12:21:52 2004 From: nick at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (Nick Bannon) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:29:02 2004 Subject: [tech] Rackmount PCs Message-ID: <20040622042152.GO491414@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> Jamie Moir mentioned that he can get SuperMicro cases. They're not dirt cheap, but they're compact and they have real hot swappable HDD trays. They come alone and in combos with motherboards. The prices below, including GST, are for the bare bones system - no drives at all. The more expensive ones come with a motherboard. SC813T-500: $890 http://www.supermicro.com/products/chassis/1U/813/SC813T-500.cfm SC813T-500: $979? http://www.supermicro.com/products/chassis/1U/813/SC813T-500C.cfm 5013C-T: $1000 http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1U/5013/SYS-5013C-T.cfm Two drives, P4 motherboard 5013C-MT: $1250 http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1U/5013/SYS-5013C-MT.cfm P4 motherboard with dual gigabit onboard and 64-bit PCI-X! 6013P-T: $1735 http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1U/6013/SYS-6013P-T.cfm Dual Xeon board, cheaper than Dell! (Then again, what prices are UCS getting on Dells?) Nick. -- Nick Bannon | "I made this letter longer than usual because nick-sig@rcpt.to | I lack the time to make it shorter." - Pascal From grahame at angrygoats.net Tue Jun 22 14:19:23 2004 From: grahame at angrygoats.net (Grahame Bowland) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:29:02 2004 Subject: [tech] Rackmount PCs In-Reply-To: <20040622042152.GO491414@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> References: <20040622042152.GO491414@morwong.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> Message-ID: <1087885163.5363.115.camel@typhaon.ucs.uwa.edu.au> On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 12:21, Nick Bannon wrote: > Jamie Moir mentioned that he can get SuperMicro cases. They're not dirt > cheap, but they're compact and they have real hot swappable HDD trays. > They come alone and in combos with motherboards. The prices below, > including GST, are for the bare bones system - no drives at all. The > more expensive ones come with a motherboard. > 6013P-T: $1735 > http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1U/6013/SYS-6013P-T.cfm > Dual Xeon board, cheaper than Dell! (Then again, what prices are UCS > getting on Dells?) Most vendors it seems a dual Xeon is worth just under $10k with 4Gb of RAM and five 130Gb SCSI disks. Dell are in that range.. we're getting a single 3.2Ghz P4 and 2Gb of RAM + 2 * 80Gb SATA disks for about $2.5k. Those sort of machines are being used for the webmail. The Dell Xeons come with excessive numbers of blue LEDs, nice management that mostly can be used from within Linux, a decent hardware RAID controller, hotswap SCSI, fans, PSUs... From bernard at blackham.com.au Wed Jun 23 14:49:36 2004 From: bernard at blackham.com.au (Bernard Blackham) Date: Wed Oct 27 01:29:02 2004 Subject: [tech] mailman weirdness Message-ID: <20040623064936.GE9951@blackham.com.au> Mailman started playing up around 12:30 today due to some stale lock files. It should be working again now, but if any emails were sent to ucc lists that never made it, you will probably need to resend it. Bernard. -- Bernard Blackham