[tech] morwong NFS speed problem

[Adrian Chadd]

On Tue, Jul 12, 2005, Leighton Haynes wrote:
> Morwong is an aging pile of poo?
> 
> Just a thought...

Hah. :-)

Alastair: get some hard figures. "pretty crap" is very useless.
Some throughputs with testing examples would be nice.

Specifically, the mounting is v3 nfs over TCP. This is good but it might
not actually be optimal for this platform. There's plenty of space to
tweak NFS. What you really need to come up with is an objective way
of measuring "crap". :-)




adrian

> On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 01:51:35PM +0800, Alastair Irvine wrote:
> > I noticed that /home read and write speeds on morwong are pretty crap
> > compared to mussel.  Any ideas?
> > 
> > -- 
> > ... "Windows bad fruit, stink like ground sloth with mange. Not do what
> >      caveman want, just do random thing it want."
> >  _____________________________________________________________________ 
> > |                                                                     |
> > |  -=*Alastair Irvine*=-   <http://www.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au/~alastair/>  |
> > |  C-monkey/wanderer/board&RPGer/net-nut  alastair at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au  |
> > |_____________________________________________________________________|
> 
> -- 
> 
> #0421 113 305 - dayta at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au
> "Linux is legacy, but it will be a start." Ken Kutaragi - SCE