[tech] [committee] Projector bulbs
James Cox
james at cox.cx
Sat Sep 24 12:43:35 AWST 2016
Bob raises some good points.
I don’t necessarily disagree, but I will say that the main projector is a
decent piece of kit, isn’t it? 1080p DLP, etc. etc. I doubt we can get
another for free that easily. Mine for example is only 1024x768 native.
[RME]~Coxy
On 24 September 2016 at 11:52, Andrew Adamson <bob at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've seen some talk in committee minutes lately about replacing the
> projector lamp/bulb. I must protest! Everyone I've ever spoken to who runs
> a lot of projectors has told me it's not worth replacing lamps.
>
> If we buy a genuine lamp, it will only come with a 3 month warranty, and
> we can probably get a better new or second hand projector for the price.
> If we buy a non-genuine lamp, there's a pretty good chance we won't get
> much life out of it. Either way, we are at the mercy of all the other
> aging parts in the old projector - which does happen due to the heat given
> off by the lamp. Not to mention dust buildup and fans aging out.
>
> I vote we use the existing projector with the old bulb until it doesn't
> work anymore, at which time we can either look around for a new one or
> another donated one. I would also point out that, in my time with the
> club, UCC has never had to spend a cent on projectors.
>
> Andrew Adamson
> bob at ucc.asn.au
>
> |"If you can't beat them, join them, and then beat them." |
> | ---Peter's Laws |
> _______________________________________________
> List Archives: http://lists.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au/pipermail/committee
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au/pipermail/tech/attachments/20160924/4d883c3d/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the tech
mailing list