[committee] UCC Aarnet bill

[Craig Williams]

I'm just running this by some of the people on our side in management to get
an opinion first.


On 28/04/09 8:53 PM, "Adrian Chadd" <adrian at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> wrote:

> 
> I'd just like to point out that I've offered my time to ITS to tidy up
> resnet, show how the service could perform 100x better with a bit of TLC,
> and help fill in whatever operational and clue gaps are there.
> 
> I've offered this time at no charge.
> 
> I just hope they take me up on it before i leave again.
> 
> 
> 
> Adrian
> 
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009, Jeremy Cole wrote:
>> I agree, its a nice letter Scott. As mentioned at the meeting though
>> i wouldn't use the streaming video idea as its well beyond what its actually
>> useful for, the mention of JPEG's as "bandwidth intensive" would hit the
>> point home just how bad (read: crap) ResNet is.
>> Heres hoping we get them to see the light
>> 
>> Jeremy
>> 
>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Scott Young <splintax at ucc.asn.au> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Conrad Pogson <prothoss at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Craig sent me this email last week, sounds like it's something we
>>>> should do.
>>> [snip]
>>>>> I have been talking about the UCC Aarnet charging with
>>> Damian/David/Mike
>>>>> from ITS and we believe there is a valid case to be made that UCC
>>> should not
>>>>> be charged under the affiliate but rather the student or staff rates.
>>> 
>>> I've attached a draft of the letter in MS Word format (plain text and
>>> PDF included as well, for the Office-impaired).
>>> 
>>> Criticism, comments and suggestions welcome!
>>> 
>>> [SJY]
>>>