[committee] UCC Aarnet bill

[Adrian Chadd]

I'd just like to point out that I've offered my time to ITS to tidy up
resnet, show how the service could perform 100x better with a bit of TLC,
and help fill in whatever operational and clue gaps are there.

I've offered this time at no charge.

I just hope they take me up on it before i leave again.



Adrian

On Tue, Apr 28, 2009, Jeremy Cole wrote:
> I agree, its a nice letter Scott. As mentioned at the meeting though
> i wouldn't use the streaming video idea as its well beyond what its actually
> useful for, the mention of JPEG's as "bandwidth intensive" would hit the
> point home just how bad (read: crap) ResNet is.
> Heres hoping we get them to see the light
> 
> Jeremy
> 
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Scott Young <splintax at ucc.asn.au> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Conrad Pogson <prothoss at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Craig sent me this email last week, sounds like it's something we
> > > should do.
> > [snip]
> > > > I have been talking about the UCC Aarnet charging with
> > Damian/David/Mike
> > > > from ITS and we believe there is a valid case to be made that UCC
> > should not
> > > > be charged under the affiliate but rather the student or staff rates.
> >
> > I've attached a draft of the letter in MS Word format (plain text and
> > PDF included as well, for the Office-impaired).
> >
> > Criticism, comments and suggestions welcome!
> >
> > [SJY]
> >