[committee] Label Printer
John Hodge
tpg at ucc.asn.au
Tue Jan 31 10:47:55 WST 2012
IP addresses? Isn't that what DNS is for? :)
If this is the best one you can find, I'm for it. Esp. since it's nice
and cheap.
John Hodge [TPG]
2011 Treasurer
On 30/01/12 17:54, Bob Adamson wrote:
> Just to clarify, the model I proposed can do punctuation and symbols,
> there's just no easy button for it and it will require several button
> presses. I spent an hour looking at other labellers as well as the cost
> and range available for matching tapes. Given the cost of alternative
> tapes is double the cost of the Dymo tapes, and the fact that it will be
> used relatively infrequently, I still think my original proposal is the
> best.
>
> Also, for large productions of labels with IP addresses, it would be as
> simple as deleting the numbers, leaving the four dots on the screen and
> then putting in new numbers. We could also save four dots as a stored
> label to make things faster the next time. So not all that
> terrible/unusable in my opinion.
>
> Andrew Adamson
> UCC President
> bob at ucc.asn.au
>
> |"The faster you move, the slower time passes, the longer you live." |
> | ---Peter's Laws |
>
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, Nick Bannon wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 02:51:15PM +0800, Bob Adamson wrote:
>>> http://www.officeworks.com.au/retail/products/Office-Supplies/Labelling/Label-Machines/SASD58480
>>
>> From experience, that may be a little too small.
>>
>> If it doesn't have a "." key, it'll suck quite a lot for typing IPv4
>> addresses or FQDNs. A ":" or "-" key would be nice.
>>
>> Nick.
>>
>> --
>> Nick Bannon | "I made this letter longer than usual because
>> nick-sig at rcpt.to | I lack the time to make it shorter." - Pascal
>>
More information about the committee
mailing list