[committee] [ucc] Minutes of Meeting on Tuesday, 19th March 2013

[Sam Moore]

Frames is correct in that committee didn't follow procedure:

http://www.ucc.asn.au/infobase/policies/guidelines.ucc

Consider this email notice that [ROW] has applied to be re-added to door, 
and that committee is likely to approve the application unless further 
objections are raised.

[SZM]
UCC Vice President 2013

On Tue, 19 Mar 2013, Frames wrote:

>> [ROW] : Rowan [ROW] for door (again)
>> 	 [ROW] removed for attending clean-up; was in U.S. during, said he
>> 	  provided notice that he was away
>> 	States he will attend future ones
>> 	-[SZM] moves [ROW] be re-added to Door, [GOZ] seconds
>>
>> 	-Motion passes, 7 for, 1 abstain
> I object to the nonfollowing of procedure.
> Applicants and reapplicants to door must email the door mailing list.
> So that door may voice any objection.
> This is because the club trusts door to know the other club members, and how 
> suitable they are/continue to be.
> In this case I do have objection:
> * It is very common for our door members to send apologies, when overseas.
> * When he was removed, it the removing committee did so with full knowledge 
> that he was out of the country, but chose to do it anyway, because of this 
> expectation of apology.
> * Rowan France is not actually the kind of person we want on door. Door 
> members should be friendly and welcoming (as per the door letter).
> Rowan will admit that he takes great pleasuring in making people 
> uncomfortable.