[committee] Door Policy Suggested Revisions

[Jeremy Cole]

Dooring of another door member should require more than just one person saying so in my opinion (this would have avoided recent drama). This could be covered by either a committee member or another door member.

Also, clarity definitely needs to be added to the punishments (as well as allowing for some discretion from the door member performing the dooring) as otherwise it seems like there's only one possible punishment for ALL cases.

Aside from that, it all seems pretty good for policy that should have been codified ages ago.

M12
(Not actually a member... Apparently)

On 15/05/2013, at 10:33, Frames <oxinabox at ucc.asn.au> wrote:

> I suggest a couple of changes:
> Replace "doored member or non-member" and "doored member" with doored person.
> for clarity/brevity.
> 
> Make it very clear as to wether or not dooring someone as punishment is reasonable.
> Make it clear what happens if 2 people door each other (I think it is resonable for them both to be doored).
> Less importantly:
> Make it clear whether the dooring person can say "Door someone for the day", or "Until they calm down.".
> Make it clear wether committee can undoor someone outside of the meeting.
> Make it clear whether committee can strip someone of their dooring powers/suspend them from door, outside of a meeting.
> Frames
> 
> On 14/05/2013 2:47 PM, Sam Moore wrote:
>> Committee is reviewing the door policy (or lack thereof). 
>> 
>> A proposed policy is here: http://www.ucc.asn.au/infobase/policies/door0.4.ucc 
>> 
>> At the moment, committee is likely to pass this policy at the next meeting. 
>> 
>> Discuss. 
>> 
>> [SZM] 
>> UCC Vice President 2013
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au/mailman/private/committee/attachments/20130515/fd2dc664/attachment.htm