[tech] flame, moray's kernel and transparent proxying

[Ian McKellar]

On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 02:52:30PM +0800, David Luyer wrote:
> > It would be much cleaner if you just bound the services to their
> > correct ports on /flame/'s address.  rlinetd lets you do this with the
> > interfaces command.
> 
> You could easily modify the driver and moray's inetd to bind() things 
> correctly to support flame.ucc and moray.ucc on the one machine.
> 
yes, but port 23 and port 80?

Ian

-- 
Ian  McKellar | Email: yakk(a)yakk.net   | Web: http://www.yakk.net/
Prefix: +61 8 | Fax/VoiceMail: 9265 0821 | Home: 9389 9162 | Work: 9380 3688