[tech] flame, moray's kernel and transparent proxying

[David Manchester]

> > It would be much cleaner if you just bound the services to their
> > correct ports on /flame/'s address.  rlinetd lets you do this with the
> > interfaces command.
> 
> You could easily modify the driver and moray's inetd to bind() things 
> correctly to support flame.ucc and moray.ucc on the one machine.
> 

Or we could migrate moray and flame onto separate boxes & we could get
the UCC's IPs back from rcpt.to 
Moray is underpowered as is.

Cheers
/dave
-- 
/  David Manchester <mustang at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au>  [TDH]  Netware/UNIX droid. \
Tell someone who's interested, tell someone who can keep their lunch digested
Tell someone who wants your conversation, tell someone who doesn't regard you
\as an argument for compulsory sterilisation." [TISM], `How Do I Love Thee?'/