[tech] Re: [wheel] Updates on mussel.

[Nick Bannon]

On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 01:54:24PM -0700, Ian McKellar wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 11:35:27PM +0800, James Bromberger wrote:
> > I have just updated a few packages on mussel. I have found that 
> > we have galeon and nautilus-mozilla installed, which conflicts with 
> > mozilla:
> > 
> > The following extra packages will be installed:
> >   libnspr4 mozilla-browser mozilla-mailnews 
> >   The following packages will be REMOVED:
> >     galeon nautilus-mozilla
> > 
> > I left it; anyone got any preferences on this?
> 
> Not that I use the machine, but...
> You should probably leave it till the galeon and Nautilus have been ported to
> the "new" mozilla. Fucking stupid fucking idiots at fucking mozilla break
> fucking source compatibility every fucking micro revision. No, I'm not grumpy
> about it.

<nod>

The compatible galeon has just arrived into unstable.

> Not having 0.9.3 is unlikely to affect people as much as not having Galeon
> and web support in Nautilus. You do all use Galeon for web browsing now don't
> you? It really does kick ass!

Mmmm... My talkback can't get through our proxyauth at work, though -
found a couple of pages which usually kill Mozilla. (
www.redbook.com.au vehicle specs, and www.bigpond.com tours )

> > Telnetd was one that got upgraded tonight. Do people still want to run a 
> > telnet daemon on here (and other boxes)? 
> 
> Isn't it needed for the charged telnet tunnel?

No, dispense is the telnetd for that, I thought. Mind you, we could do
with a charged sshd or equivalent system.

Nick.

-- 
  Nick Bannon  | "I made this letter longer than usual because
nick at it.net.au | I lack the time to make it shorter." - Pascal