[committee] UCC Aarnet bill

[Jeremy Cole]

I agree, its a nice letter Scott. As mentioned at the meeting though
i wouldn't use the streaming video idea as its well beyond what its actually
useful for, the mention of JPEG's as "bandwidth intensive" would hit the
point home just how bad (read: crap) ResNet is.
Heres hoping we get them to see the light

Jeremy

On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Scott Young <splintax at ucc.asn.au> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Conrad Pogson <prothoss at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Craig sent me this email last week, sounds like it's something we
> > should do.
> [snip]
> > > I have been talking about the UCC Aarnet charging with
> Damian/David/Mike
> > > from ITS and we believe there is a valid case to be made that UCC
> should not
> > > be charged under the affiliate but rather the student or staff rates.
>
> I've attached a draft of the letter in MS Word format (plain text and
> PDF included as well, for the Office-impaired).
>
> Criticism, comments and suggestions welcome!
>
> [SJY]
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au/mailman/private/committee/attachments/20090428/d8c63f77/attachment.htm